Fifty matched pairs of magnitude/depth measurements randomly selected from 10,594 earthquakes recorded in one year from a location in southern California. Find the best predicted depth of an earthquake with a magnitude of 1.5 Use a significance level of 0.05.
Mag Depth
0.74 5.3
0.84 12.1
0.36 2.4
1.15 7.7
2.23 18.9
1.67 15.5
0.49 10.4
2.67 16.5
2.67 2.4
1.96 5.3
1.14 3.9
1.64 6.9
0.94 14.2
1.23 6.3
0.05 16.8
2.31 18.6
0.84 17.7
0.94 17.3
1.51 11.6
0.19 13.1
2.14 14.4
0.29 11.1
0.36 9.2
1.33 9.1
2.99 19.8
0.27 2.4
1.08 7.4
2.61 3.8
2.12 5.2
1.64 5.5
0.33 18.7
2.62 7.5
0.22 2.9
1.23 3.7
0.73 7.4
0.28 8.2
1.28 9.7
2.35 13.2
2.65 15.7
1.13 14.5
0.63 12.1
2.08 3.9
2.18 11.6
0.32 10.2
0.02 7.1
0.21 3.5
0.17 5.6
2.32 5.7
1.58 6.3
1.05 18.3
The regression equation is ^y = ? + ? x
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Given that the earthquake has a magnitude of
1.5, the best predicted depth is ?
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
from excel: data -data analysis: regression:
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | |
Regression | 1 | 27.66559 | 27.66559 | 0.990117 | 0.324704 |
Residual | 48 | 1341.203 | 27.94173 | ||
Total | 49 | 1368.869 | |||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | ||
Intercept | 8.829802 | 1.336339 | 6.607457 | 2.94E-08 | |
Mag | 0.864063 | 0.868364 | 0.995046 | 0.324704 |
1)
regression equation y^ =8.8+0.9x
2)
since p value >0.05 regression is not significant
the best predicted depth is =average value of depth = 9.9
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.