Question

according to an article in science daily ("still no strong evidence that Adjunct treatment with high in IVF improves results, "sciencedaily.com, July 4, 2016, retrieved November 26, 2016), women who are having difficulty becoming pregnant sometimes use human growth hormone (high) in addition to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to try to have a baby. A large study found that "there was no strong evidence" that the proportion of women who become pregnant while taking high along with IVF was greater than the success rate for IVF alone.

a) Is this consistent with testing

Ho: HIGH in addition to IVF increases the chance of getting pregnant

versus

Ho: HIGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of getting pregnant

or with testing

Ho: HIGH in addition to IVF does not increase the chance of getting pregnant

versus

Ho: HIGH in addition to IVF increases the chance of getting pregnant

Explain

b) Does the stated conclusion of "no strong evidence" indicate that the null hypothesis was rejected? Explain

Answer 1

a) Null hypothesis Ho :