Question

Researchers were interested in whether patients with a history of angina are more likely to take...

Researchers were interested in whether patients with a history of angina are more likely to take anticoagulant drugs. (5 points)

angina2 * Taking anticoagulant drugs Crosstabulation

Taking anticoagulant drugs

Total

Yes

No

Angina

Yes

Count

311

25

336

Expected Count

177.3

158.7

336.0

Std. Residual

10.0

-10.6

No

Count

242

470

712

Expected Count

375.7

336.3

712.0

Std. Residual

-6.9

7.3

Total

Count

553

495

1048

Expected Count

553.0

495.0

1048.0

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

314.204

1

.000

Continuity Correctionb

311.859

1

.000

Likelihood Ratio

358.893

1

.000

Fisher's Exact Test

.000

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

313.904

1

.000

N of Valid Cases

1048

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for angina2 (Yes / No)

24.160

15.623

37.363

For cohort Taking anticoagulant drugs = Yes

2.723

2.447

3.030

For cohort Taking anticoagulant drugs = No

.113

.077

.165

N of Valid Cases

1048

  1. Identify the null and alternate hypothesis.
  2. Interpret test statistic and state conclusion based on original hypothesis. Assume alpha = .05
  3. Interpret the odds ratio based on original research hypothesis.

Interpret the relative risk for those patients who take anticoagulant medications

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Researchers were interested in whether patients with a history of angina are more likely to take anticoagulant drugs.

Identify the null and alternate hypothesis.

Ho: There is no association between history of angina and taking anticoagulant drugs

H1: There is an association between history of angina and taking anticoagulant drugs

Interpret test statistic and state conclusion based on original hypothesis. Assume alpha = .05

Calculated chi square 314.204 , P=0.000 which is < 0.05 level of significance. Ho is rejected. We conclude that there is significant association between history of angina and taking anticoagulant drugs

Interpret the odds ratio based on original research hypothesis.

Odds ratio =24.16

People with history of angina are taking anticoagulant drugs 24.16 times more compared to People with no history of angina.

Interpret the relative risk for those patients who take anticoagulant medications

relative risk = (311/553)/(25/495) = 11.14

The relative risk of taking anticoagulant medications is 11.14 times that of people with history of angina compared to no history of angina.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Researchers were interested in examining the impact poverty may have on self-perceptions of health. Participants were...
Researchers were interested in examining the impact poverty may have on self-perceptions of health. Participants were asked to rate their health as in good or poor. Their income level was categorized as above or below the poverty line. Use the two tables below to answer the following questions. Identify the null and alternate hypothesis. Interpret test statistic and state conclusion based on original hypothesis. Assume alpha = .05 Interpret the odds ratio based on original research hypothesis. Interpret the relative...
Researchers were interested in examining whether a history of diabetes influenced where patients recovering from Coronary...
Researchers were interested in examining whether a history of diabetes influenced where patients recovering from Coronary Artery Bypass Graft surgery completed their cardiac rehab Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.341a 3 .148 Likelihood Ratio 5.123 3 .163 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.237 1 .022 N of Valid Cases 787 a. 1 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.84. Identify the independent and dependent variable. What is the null and alternate hypothesis?...
Researchers were interested in examining the impact poverty may have on self-perceptions of health. Participants were...
Researchers were interested in examining the impact poverty may have on self-perceptions of health. Participants were asked to rate their health as in good or poor. Their income level was categorized as above or below the poverty line. Use the two tables below to answer the following questions. Identify the null and alternate hypothesis. Interpret test statistic and state conclusion based on original hypothesis. Assume alpha = .05 Interpret the odds ratio based on original research hypothesis. Interpret the relative...
Chapter 18 Chi-square – Test of Independence Certain editors at Sage like to think they’re a...
Chapter 18 Chi-square – Test of Independence Certain editors at Sage like to think they’re a bit of a whiz at soccer. To see how well they play compared with Sussex lecturers and postgraduates, we invited various employees of Sage to join in our soccer matches. Every player was allowed only to play in one match. Over many matches, we counted the number of players that scored goals. After running a chi-square test of independence, determine whether or not the...
EVER BEEN DIVORCED OR SEPARATED * BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH Crosstabulation BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER...
EVER BEEN DIVORCED OR SEPARATED * BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH Crosstabulation BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH Total YES NO EVER BEEN DIVORCED OR SEPARATED YES Count 396 82 478 % within BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH 26.1% 24.3% 25.8% NO Count 1119 256 1375 % within BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH 73.9% 75.7% 74.2% Total Count 1515 338 1853 % within BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% The description of this table is that yes 26.1% believe...