The accompanying data were read from graphs that appeared in an article. The variables shown are the number of acres burned in forest fires in the western United States and timber sales.
Year | Number of Acres Burned (thousands) |
Timber Sales (billions of board feet) |
1945 | 208 | 2.2 |
1950 | 254 | 3.6 |
1955 | 260 | 4.3 |
1960 | 379 | 6.8 |
1965 | 85 | 9.9 |
1970 | 444 | 11.0 |
1975 | 174 | 11.1 |
1980 | 246 | 10.4 |
1985 | 438 | 9.9 |
1990 | 410 | 11.0 |
1995 | 182 | 3.7 |
(a) Compute the correlation coefficient. (Give the answer to
three decimal places.)
r =
Is there a correlation between timber sales and acres burned in
forest fires?
strong positive correlationweak positive correlation strong negative correlationweak negative correlationno correlation
(b) The article concludes that "heavier logging led to large forest
fires." Do you think this conclusion is justified based on the
given data?
YesNo
a)
correlation coefficient r= | Sxy/(√Sxx*Syy) = | 0.307 |
weak positive correlation
b)
Since above study is observational , correlation does not indicate causation.
Therefore the conclusion is not justified.
No
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.