Question

Discuss an example of Causation vs Correlation in Respiratory Therapy.

Discuss an example of Causation vs Correlation in Respiratory Therapy.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Much of scientific evidence is based upon a correlation of variables – they tend to occur together. Scientists are careful to point out that correlation does not necessarily mean causation. The assumption that A causes B simply because A correlates with B is a logical fallacy – it is not a legitimate form of argument. However, sometimes people commit the opposite fallacy – dismissing correlation entirely, as if it does not imply causation. This would dismiss a large swath of important scientific evidence.

For example, the tobacco industry abused this fallacy to argue that simply because smoking correlates with lung cancer that does not mean that smoking causes lung cancer. The simple correlation is not enough to arrive at a conclusion of causation, but multiple correlations all triangulating on the conclusion that smoking causes lung cancer, combined with biological plausibility, does.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
This week we're exploring causation and correlation. Why is it a fallacy to confuse causation and...
This week we're exploring causation and correlation. Why is it a fallacy to confuse causation and correlation? Provide an example of a statement that confuses causation with correlation.
Respiratory Therapy
Respiratory Therapy
The adage in psychology is that “correlation does not imply causation.” However, we know that smoking...
The adage in psychology is that “correlation does not imply causation.” However, we know that smoking cigarettes causes cancer, despite the fact that most of the evidence for this is correlational. Provide an example of a hypothetical study where correlation does not imply causation and what the researcher can do to further understand the nature of the correlation.
1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that...
1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe.
What is the difference between correlation and causation
What is the difference between correlation and causation
When does correlation not imply causation?
When does correlation not imply causation?
Explain how and why Correlation is NOT Causation.
Explain how and why Correlation is NOT Causation.
Describe the difference between correlation and causation, including a discussion of the coefficient of correlation and...
Describe the difference between correlation and causation, including a discussion of the coefficient of correlation and the coefficient of determination (ch.13).
TRUE OR FALE 1. Statistical correlation is equivalent to causation. 2. Causation occurs when a change...
TRUE OR FALE 1. Statistical correlation is equivalent to causation. 2. Causation occurs when a change in a variable causes change in another.
We have learned that “correlation is not causation.” However, we have also learned that correlational studies...
We have learned that “correlation is not causation.” However, we have also learned that correlational studies can provide evidence for hypothesized causal mechanisms. There are three rules for establishing causation between two variables. What are these rules? Give an example for each of these rules.