Question

A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...

A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 14% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 31% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 12% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the population of Blue Valley changed?

Under 20 20 - 35 36 - 50 51 - 65 Over 65
25 28 66 65 26

(i) Give the value of the level of significance.


State the null and alternate hypotheses.

H0: The distributions for the population 10 years ago and the population today are the same.
H1: The distributions for the population 10 years ago and the population today are different.H0: The population 10 years ago and the population today are independent.
H1: The population 10 years ago and the population today are not independent.    H0: Ages under 20 years old, 20- to 35-year-old, between 36 and 50, between 51 and 65, and over 65 are independent.
H1: Ages under 20 years old, 20- to 35-year-old, between 36 and 50, between 51 and 65, and over 65 are not independent.H0: Time ten years ago and today are independent.
H1: Time ten years ago and today are not independent.


(ii) Find the sample test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)


(iii) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic.

P-value > 0.1000.050 < P-value < 0.100    0.025 < P-value < 0.0500.010 < P-value < 0.0250.005 < P-value < 0.010P-value < 0.005


(iv) Conclude the test.

Since the P-value < α, we reject the null hypothesis.Since the P-value ≥ α, we do not reject the null hypothesis.    Since the P-value < α, we do not reject the null hypothesis.Since the P-value ≥ α, we reject the null hypothesis.


(v) Interpret the conclusion in the context of the application.

At the 1% level of significance, there is insufficient evidence to claim that the age distribution of the population of Blue Valley has changed.At the 1% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to claim that the age distribution of the population of Blue Valley has changed.    

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(iv) Conclusion: Since the P-value ≥ α, we do not reject the null hypothesis.

(v) Interpretation: At the 1% level of significance, there is insufficient evidence to claim that the age distribution of the population of Blue Valley has changed.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 20% were under 20 years old, 13%were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 30% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 13% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the population...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 12% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 31% were between 36 and 50, 23% were between 51 and 65, and 15% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 20% were under 20 years old, 13% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 30% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 13% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 12% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 34% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 11% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 14% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 34% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 9% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 20% were under 20 years old, 10% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 32% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 14% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 12% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 34% were between 36 and 50, 23% were between 51 and 65, and 12% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 14% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 29% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 14% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 13% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 32% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 12% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the...
A sociologist is studying the age of the population in Blue Valley. Ten years ago, the population was such that 19% were under 20 years old, 12% were in the 20- to 35-year-old bracket, 32% were between 36 and 50, 24% were between 51 and 65, and 13% were over 65. A study done this year used a random sample of 210 residents. This sample is given below. At the 0.01 level of significance, has the age distribution of the...