Question

The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the...

The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the quality of management and the reputation of the company for over 250 worldwide corporations. Both the quality of management and the reputation of the company were rated on an excellent, good, and fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for 200 respondents below applies to this study.

Quality of Management Reputation of Company
Excellent Good Fair
Excellent 40 25 5
Good 35 35 10
Fair 25 10 15

(a)

Use a 0.05 level of significance and test for independence of the quality of management and the reputation of the company.

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is not equal across companies with differing reputations.

H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.  

H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is equal across companies with differing reputations.

H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.

Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)

Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

p-value =

State your conclusion.

Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating of the reputation of the company.

Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is not independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.

Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the ratings for the quality of management and the reputation of the company are not independent.

Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.

(b)

If there is a dependence or association between the two ratings, discuss and use probabilities to justify your answer.

For companies with an excellent reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to (excellent, good, or fair) management quality. For companies with a good reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to  (excellent, good, or fair) management quality. For companies with a fair reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to (excellent, good, or fair) management quality. Since these highest probabilities correspond to (different, the same) ratings of quality of management and reputation, the two ratings are (independent or associated)

Homework Answers

Answer #1

H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.  

2)

Applying chi square test of independence:
Expected Ei=row total*column total/grand total excellent good fair Total
excellent 35.0000 24.5000 10.5000 70.00
good 40.0000 28.0000 12.0000 80.00
fair 25.0000 17.5000 7.5000 50.00
total 100.00 70.00 30.00 200.00
chi square    χ2 =(Oi-Ei)2/Ei excellent good fair Total
excellent 0.714 0.010 2.881 3.6054
good 0.625 1.750 0.333 2.7083
fair 0.000 3.214 7.500 10.7143
total 1.3393 4.9745 10.7143 17.028
test statistic X2 = 17.028
p value = 0.0019

Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is not independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.

b)

For companies with an excellent reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to excellenet management quality. For companies with a good reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to good management quality. For companies with a fair reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to fair management quality. Since these highest probabilities correspond to different  ratings of quality of management and reputation, the two ratings are associated

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the...
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the Quality of Management and the Reputation of the Company for over 250 world-wide corporations. Both the Quality of Management and the Reputation of the Company were rated on an Excellent, Good, and Fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for 200 respondents below applies to this study. Reputation of Company Quality of Management Excellent Good Fair Excellent 40 25   5 Good 35 35 10...
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the...
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the quality of management and the reputation of the company for over 250 worldwide corporations. Quality of management is rated on a scale of exceptional, moderate, and needs improvement categorical scale. And company reputation is rated on a scale of excellent, good, and fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for the respondents are below: Excellent Good Fair Exceptional 40 25 5 Moderate 35 38...
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the...
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the quality of management and the reputation of the company for over 250 worldwide corporations. Quality of management is rated on a scale of exceptional, moderate, and needs improvement categorical scale. And company reputation is rated on a scale of excellent, good, and fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for the respondents are below: excellent good fair exceptional 40 25 5 moderate 35 32...
Problem 3: A Corporate Perceptions Study surveyed 200 readers and asked them on how they would...
Problem 3: A Corporate Perceptions Study surveyed 200 readers and asked them on how they would rate XYZ Corporation on the “Quality of Management” and the “Reputation of the Company”. The two variables of the study were rated on a categorical scale as excellent, good, and fair. The sample data on 200 responses for the study is summarized as follows. Conduct an appropriate hypothesis test for this problem to check if the variables are independent of each other. Reputation of...
CASE STUDY – Jacobson Carpet Company In January 2002, Ms. Mary Lewis was preparing to meet...
CASE STUDY – Jacobson Carpet Company In January 2002, Ms. Mary Lewis was preparing to meet with Mr. Carpenter, President of Jacobson Carpet Company. Ms. Lewis assumed that the meeting was related to the recent Board of directors of the company. As a direct assistant to the President, she knew from experience that this type of meeting often resulted in a project to be studied. Her expectation was confirmed as soon as Mr. Carpenter began to inform her of the...
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
Delta airlines case study Global strategy. Describe the current global strategy and provide evidence about how...
Delta airlines case study Global strategy. Describe the current global strategy and provide evidence about how the firms resources incompetencies support the given pressures regarding costs and local responsiveness. Describe entry modes have they usually used, and whether they are appropriate for the given strategy. Any key issues in their global strategy? casestudy: Atlanta, June 17, 2014. Sea of Delta employees and their families swarmed between food trucks, amusement park booths, and entertainment venues that were scattered throughout what would...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From the April 2004 Issue Save Share 8.95 In 1991, Progressive Insurance, an automobile insurer based in Mayfield Village, Ohio, had approximately $1.3 billion in sales. By 2002, that figure had grown to $9.5 billion. What fashionable strategies did Progressive employ to achieve sevenfold growth in just over a decade? Was it positioned in a high-growth industry? Hardly. Auto insurance is a mature, 100-year-old industry...