A bus company advertised a mean time of 150 minutes for a trip between two cities. A consumer group had reason to believe that the mean time was significantly different from 150 minutes. A sample of 40 trips showed a mean x̄= 153 minutes and a standard deviation s=7.5 minutes. At the 4% level of significance, test the advertisement claim. Apply two-sided test, and give all six steps of the procedure clearly. Finally interpret the conclusion in terms of the example
Solution:
Here, we have to use one sample t test for the population mean.
The null and alternative hypotheses are given as below:
Null hypothesis: H0: The mean time for a trip between two cities was 150 minutes.
Alternative hypothesis: Ha: The mean time for a trip between two cities was significantly different from 150 minutes.
H0: µ = 150 versus Ha: µ ≠ 150
This is a two tailed test.
The test statistic formula is given as below:
t = (Xbar - µ)/[S/sqrt(n)]
From given data, we have
µ = 150
Xbar = 153
S = 7.5
n = 40
df = n – 1 = 39
α = 0.04
Critical value = ±2.1247
(by using t-table or excel)
t = (Xbar - µ)/[S/sqrt(n)]
t = (153 - 150)/[7.5/sqrt(40)]
t = 2.5298
P-value = 0.0156
(by using t-table)
P-value < α = 0.04
So, we reject the null hypothesis
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time for a trip between two cities was significantly different from 150 minutes.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.