Question

should you be more concerned about a positive test for a rare disease or a common...

should you be more concerned about a positive test for a rare disease or a common disease? explain your answer.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

We should be more concerned about the positive test for a rare disease because if the disease is common then it is very high chance that its cure will be there and easily accessible in the hospitals.
But if the disease is rare then the chances are less that its cure is available and even if it is available, it might not be accessible.
For exampl: pneumonia is a common disease but we can get it treated easily. And AIDS is rarer disease than pneumonia but its cure is not available

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A new test for the diagnosis of a rare disease has a 93% probability of a...
A new test for the diagnosis of a rare disease has a 93% probability of a positive result if the patient is sick and a 83% probability of a negative result if the patient is not sick. We know that only 1% of the population has this rare disease. What is the probability that a patient is sick if the test is positive?
A rare disease exists in 3% of the population. A medical test exists that can detect...
A rare disease exists in 3% of the population. A medical test exists that can detect (positive results) this disease 98% of the time for those who do, in fact have this disease. On the other hand, 5% of the time positive results will come back for those who do not have this disease. a. Draw a "tree diagram" illustrating this scenario. b. Determine the probability that a person will test positive. C. Determine the probability that a person who...
Suppose that a rare disease occurs in the general population in only one of every 10,000...
Suppose that a rare disease occurs in the general population in only one of every 10,000 people. A medical test is used to detect the disease. If a person has the disease, the probability that the test result is positive is 0.99. If a person does not have the disease, the probability that the test result is positive is 0.02. Given that a person’s test result is positive, find the probability that this person truly has the rare disease?
Suppose four out of every 10,000 individuals in a country has a rare disease. a test...
Suppose four out of every 10,000 individuals in a country has a rare disease. a test for the disease exist. individuals known to have the disease test positive 96% of the time individuals known to be free of the disease test negative 96% of the time. Suppose an individual from the country is selected at random( with all being equally likely to be selected) and given the test . Given that the individuals test positive what is the probability that...
A screening test for a rare form of TB has a 7% false positive rate (i.e....
A screening test for a rare form of TB has a 7% false positive rate (i.e. indicates the presence of the disease in people who do not have it). The test has an 8% false negative rate (i.e. indicates the absence of the disease in people who do have it). In a population of which 0.6% have the disease, what is the probability that someone who tests positive has the disease?
The screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood...
The screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood test that is considered fairly reliable. It gives a positive reaction in 94.2% of the people who have that disease. However, it erroneously gives a positive reaction in 2.7% of the people who do not have the disease. Consider the null hypothesis "the individual does not have the disease" to answer the following questions. a. What is the probability of a Type I error?...
The screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood...
The screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood test that is considered fairly reliable. It gives a positive reaction in 94.6% of the people who have that disease. However, it erroneously gives a positive reaction in 4.1% of the people who do not have the disease. Consider the null hypothesis "the individual does not have the disease" to answer the following questions. a. What is the probability of a Type I error?...
A new diagnostic test is created to assist in detection of a rare disease. During development,...
A new diagnostic test is created to assist in detection of a rare disease. During development, a study is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of this new test. The test is run on 100 known cases and 200 controls. Results indicate that 90 of the cases yield positive tests, as do 30 of the controls. 07. The Positive Predictive Value for this test indicates that: A. The likelihood that a positive test result is predictive of disease is 30/120, or...
Most medical tests used today have about a 5% false positive rate, which some doctors will...
Most medical tests used today have about a 5% false positive rate, which some doctors will take to mean that if a patient’s test comes back positive, that the patient has a 95% chance of having the disease. A 95% chance is very high, and so the doctor will assume that the patient has the disease and will start an aggressive and potentially dangerous course of treatment. For your first problem, you will show that, for rare diseases, this common...
You are evaluating a the sensitivity and specificity of a screening test. Disease Positive Disease Negative...
You are evaluating a the sensitivity and specificity of a screening test. Disease Positive Disease Negative Screen Positive 20 150 Screen Negative 5 9640 Calculate the sensitivity of the screening test. Calculate the specificity of the screening test.