A news article reports that "Americans have differing views on two potentially inconvenient and invasive practices that airports could implement to uncover potential terrorist attacks." This news piece was based on a survey conducted among a random sample of 1142 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone November 7-10, 2010, where one of the questions on the survey was "Some airports are now using 'full-body' digital x-ray machines to electronically screen passengers in airport security lines. Do you think these new x-ray machines should or should not be used at airports?" Below is a summary of responses based on party affiliation. Round all numeric answers to 4 decimal places.
Republican | Democrat | Independent | Total | |
Should | 265 | 301 | 353 | 919 |
Should not | 38 | 55 | 77 | 170 |
Don't know/No answer | 16 | 15 | 22 | 53 |
Total | 319 | 371 | 452 | 1142 |
1. What is the proportion of Republicans who think the full-body
scans should be applied in airports?
2. What is the proportion of Democrats who think the full-body scans should be applied in airports?
3. What are the correct hypotheses for a hypothesis test
evaluating whether there is a difference in the proportion of
Republicans and Democrats who think the full-body scans should be
applied in airports? Assume that all relevant conditions are
met.
A. ?0:?1=?2H0:p1=p2 ; ??:?1≠?2HA:p1≠p2
B. ?0:?1=?2H0:p1=p2 ; ??:?1<?2HA:p1<p2
C. ?0:?1=?2H0:p1=p2 ; ??:?1>?2HA:p1>p2
4. Calculate the pooled estimate of a proportion for this test.
5. Calculate the standard error for this test.
6. Calculate the test statistic for this hypothesis test.
? z t X^2 F =
7. Calculate the p-value for this hypothesis test.
8. Based on the p-value, we have:
A. some evidence
B. very strong evidence
C. extremely strong evidence
D. little evidence
E. strong evidence
that the null model is not a good fit for our observed data.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.