A company makes dog food at four different plants and in four different formulas. One of the ingredients with a particular importance is crude fat. To discover if there is a difference in the average percent of crude fat among the four formulas and among the production sites, two-way ANOVA analysis is performed and the output is given below: Two Way Analysis of Variance results:
Source DF SS MS F-stat P-value
Plant 3 73.25 24.4167 4.4904 0.0181
Formula 3 144.25 48.0833 8.8429 0.0011
Interaction 9 45 5 0.9195 0.5332
Error 16 87 5.4375
Total 31 349.50
1- The number of treatments in this analysis is:
A.8
B.12
C.16
D.9
2-
Which of the following is the number of observations per treatment used?
A.4
B.6
C.2
D.3
3-Which of the following is the null and alternate hypotheses to determine if there is interaction between the formulas and the plant sites where they are produced?
a
HO Formula and plant do not interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
HA Formula and plant do not interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
b-
HO Formula and plant do interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
HA Not all formula and plant means are equal
c-
HO Formula and plant do not interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
HA Not all formula and plant means are equal
d-
HOFormula and plant do interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
HA Formula and plant do not interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
4-
What’s
the conclusion using 0.05 level of significance for the test that determines if there is interaction between the formulas and the plant sites where they are produced?
a-Do not reject H0. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the formula and plant do interact to affect the average crude fat percentage.
b-Do not reject H0.There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the formula and plant do interact to affect the average crude fat percentage.
c-Reject H0. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the formula and plant do interact to affect the average crude fat percentage.
d-Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that not all formula and plant means are equal.
5-
What’s the conclusion using 0.05 level of significance for the test that determines if there is a difference in the average percentage of crude fat in the four formulas?
a- Reject H0 There is insufficient evidence to indicate that at least 2 formulas have different averages of percentage of crude fat.
b- Reject H0 There is sufficient evidence to indicate that at least 2 formulas have different averages of percentage of crude fat.
c- DNR H0 There is sufficient evidence to indicate that at least 2 formulas have different averages of percentage of crude fat.
d- DNR H0 There is insufficient evidence to indicate that at least 2 formulas have different averages of percentage of crude fat.
A.8
..........
2)
A.4
.
3)
HO Formula and plant do not interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
HA Formula and plant do interact to affect the average crude fat percentage
4)
p valu>0.05
a-Do not reject H0. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the formula and plant do interact to affect the average crude fat percentage.
.............
5)
p value<0.05
b- Reject H0 There is sufficient evidence to indicate that at least 2 formulas have different averages of percentage of crude fat.
.............
Please let me know in case of any doubt.
Thanks in advance!
Please upvote!
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.