Question

A random sample of 1515 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of...

A random sample of 1515 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 42.942.9 with a standard deviation of 2.82.8. A random sample of 1212 nursing students from Group 2 resulted in a mean score of 48.448.4 with a standard deviation of 5.15.1. Can you conclude that the mean score for Group 1 is significantly lower than the mean score for Group 2? Let μ1μ1 represent the mean score for Group 1 and μ2μ2 represent the mean score for Group 2. Use a significance level of α=0.01α=0.01 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed.

Step 2 of 4 :  

Compute the value of the t test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

H0: Null Hypothesis:

HA:Alternative Hypothesis:

Pooled Standard Deviation is given by:

The test Statistic is given by:

The test Statistic = - 3.569

=0.01

df = 15 + 12 - 2 = 25

From Table, critical value of t = - 2.485

Since calculated value of t = - 3.569 is less than critical value of t = - 2.485, the difference is significant. Reject null hypothesis.

Conclusion:
The data support the claim that the mean score for Group 1 is significantly lower than the mean score for Group 2

Question asked:

Compute the value of the t test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.

The test Statistic = - 3.569

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 1010 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 55.755.7 with a standard deviation of 7.97.9. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 1010 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 45.345.3 with a standard deviation of 4.54.5. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 1313 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 60.860.8 with a standard deviation of 4.64.6. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 1313 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 68.668.6 with a standard deviation of 4.24.2. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 99 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 65 with a standard deviation of 6.2 A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 1818 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 46.146.1 with a standard deviation of 5.95.9. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 15 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 59.6 with a standard deviation of 8.1. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 15 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 63.9 with a standard deviation of 7.6. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 16 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 59.2 with a standard deviation of 33. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 13 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 60.1 with a standard deviation of 7.2. A...