Based on a simple random sample of size 90, an 84% confidence interval for the unknown mean SAT MATH score, μμ, in some large population is 517<μ<525517<μ<525.
Which of the following is/are correct interpretation(s) of this
confidence interval?There may be more than one correct answer; you
must check all correct answers in order to get credit for this
problem.
A. 84% of individuals in this sample have a mean
SAT MATH score between 517 and 525.
B. 84% of individuals in this population have a
SAT MATH score between 517 and 525.
C. There is an 84% chance that another sample of
size 90 from this population would have a mean SAT MATH score
between 517 and 525.
D. 84% of all samples of size 90 from this
population would have a mean SAT MATH score between 517 and
525.
E. There is an 84% chance that the true mean SAT
MATH score for the entire population is between 517 and 525.
F. There is an 84% chance the interval
517<μ<525517<μ<525 contains the true mean SAT MATH
score for the entire population.
Based on a simple random sample of size 620, a 91% confidence
interval for the mean IQ score, μμ, in some large population is
reported as 100.9±8.5100.9±8.5. Which of the following is/are
correct interpretation(s) of this confidence interval?There may be
more than one correct answer; you must check all correct answers in
order to get credit for this problem.
A. There is a 91% chance that another sample of
size 620 would have a mean IQ score within 8.5 points of
100.9.
B. 91% of the 620 individuals in this sample have
an IQ score that is within 8.5 points of the population mean.
C. There is a 91% chance that the true mean IQ
score for the entire population is within 8.5 points of
100.9.
D. 91% of all individuals have an IQ score within
8.5 points of 100.9.
E. There is a 91% chance that 100.9 is within 8.5
points of the true mean IQ score for the entire population.
F. 91% of all samples of size 620 would have a
mean IQ score within 8.5 points of 100.9.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.