Suppose the null hypothesis is not rejected not rejected. State the conclusion based on the results of the test.
Three years ago, the mean price of a single-family home was $ 243,725 A real estate broker believes that the mean price has decreased decreased since then.
Which of the following is the correct conclusion?
A. There is is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has decreased decreased.
B. There is not is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has decreased decreased.
C. There is not is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has not changed.
D. There is is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has not changed.
Given:
Null Hypothesis is Not Rejected. i.e.Null Hypothesis is Accepted
The mean price of a single-family home was $ 243,725 i.e. = $243,725
Hypothesis:
Ho: = $243,725
Ha: < $243,725 (The mean price of a single-family home has decreased decreased.)
ANSWER: B.
There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has decreased decreased.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.