Question

Using the two-sample hypothesis test comparing old call time to new call time at a .05...

  • Using the two-sample hypothesis test comparing old call time to new call time at a .05 level of significance, discuss the hypothesis test assumptions and tests used. Provide the test statistic and p-value in your response. Evaluate the results of the hypothesis test with the scenario. Provide recommendations for the vice president.
  • Using new call time and coded quality, develop a prediction equation for new call time. Evaluate the model and discuss the coefficient of determination, significance, and use the prediction equation to predict a call time if there is a defect.
  • Evaluate whether the new call time meets customer specification. As stated in a previous lesson, customers indicated they did not want a call time longer than 7.5 minutes. Assume a standard deviation of 2 min is acceptable. Is the call center now meeting the customer specifications? If not where is the specification not being met? Explain your answers.

thank you so much!!!!

Old Call Time New Call Time Shift Quality Coded Quality
6.5 5.2 AM Y 0
6.5 5.2 AM Y 0
6.5 5.2 AM Y 0
6.5 5.2 AM Y 0
7 5.6 AM Y 0
7 5.6 AM Y 0
7 5.6 AM Y 0
7 5.6 AM N 1
7 5.6 AM Y 0
8 6.4 AM Y 0
8 6.4 AM Y 0
8.5 6.8 AM Y 0
8.5 6.8 AM Y 0
9 7.2 AM Y 0
9 7.2 AM Y 0
9 7.2 AM N 1
9 7.2 AM N 1
9.5 7.6 AM N 1
9.5 7.6 AM Y 0
9.5 7.6 AM Y 0
10 8 AM Y 0
10 8 AM Y 0
10 8 AM Y 0
10 8 AM Y 0
10 8 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
10.5 8.4 AM Y 0
11.5 9.2 AM Y 0
11.5 9.2 AM Y 0
11.5 9.2 AM Y 0
12 9.6 AM Y 0
12 9.6 AM Y 0
12 9.6 AM N 1
12 9.6 AM Y 0
12.5 10 AM Y 0
12.5 10 AM N 1
13 10.4 AM Y 0
13 10.4 AM Y 0
13.5 10.8 AM Y 0
15.5 12.4 AM Y 0
16 12.8 AM Y 0
16.5 13.2 AM Y 0
17 13.6 AM Y 0
18 14.4 AM Y 0
6 4.8 PM Y 0
9 7.2 PM N 1
9.5 7.6 PM N 1
10 8 PM Y 0
10.5 8.4 PM Y 0
10.5 8.4 PM Y 0
11 8.8 PM Y 0
11 8.8 PM Y 0
11 8.8 PM Y 0
11 8.8 PM Y 0
11.5 9.2 PM Y 0
11.5 9.2 PM Y 0
11.5 9.2 PM Y 0
12 9.6 PM Y 0
12 9.6 PM Y 0
12 9.6 PM Y 0
12 9.6 PM Y 0
12 9.6 PM Y 0
12 9.6 PM Y 0
12 9.6 PM Y 0
12.5 10 PM Y 0
12.5 10 PM Y 0
12.5 10 PM Y 0
12.5 10 PM Y 0
13 10.4 PM N 1
13 10.4 PM N 1
13.5 10.8 PM Y 0
13.5 10.8 PM Y 0
14 11.2 PM Y 0
14 11.2 PM Y 0
14 11.2 PM Y 0
14 11.2 PM N 1
14 11.2 PM Y 0
14.5 11.6 PM Y 0
14.5 11.6 PM Y 0
14.5 11.6 PM N 1
15 12 PM N 1
15 12 PM Y 0
15.5 12.4 PM N 1
16 12.8 PM Y 0
16.5 13.2 PM Y 0
17 13.6 PM Y 0
17.5 14 PM Y 0
18 14.4 PM Y 0
18 14.4 PM Y 0
18 14.4 PM Y 0
18.5 14.8 PM Y 0
19 15.2 PM Y 0
19.5 15.6 PM Y 0
19.5 15.6 PM Y 0
5.25 4.2 AM Y 0
5.25 4.2 PM Y 0
5.25 4.2 AM Y 0
5.25 4.2 PM Y 0
5.75 4.6 AM Y 0
5.75 4.6 PM Y 0
5.75 4.6 AM Y 0
5.75 4.6 PM Y 0
5.75 4.6 AM Y 0
6.75 5.4 PM Y 0
6.75 5.4 AM Y 0
7.25 5.8 PM Y 0
7.25 5.8 AM Y 0
7.75 6.2 PM Y 0
7.75 6.2 AM Y 0
7.75 6.2 PM N 1
7.75 6.2 AM Y 0
8.25 6.6 PM Y 0
8.25 6.6 AM N 1
8.25 6.6 PM Y 0
8.75 7 AM Y 0
8.75 7 PM Y 0
8.75 7 AM Y 0
8.75 7 PM Y 0
8.75 7 AM Y 0
9.25 7.4 PM Y 0
9.25 7.4 AM Y 0
9.25 7.4 PM Y 0
9.25 7.4 AM Y 0
9.25 7.4 PM Y 0
9.25 7.4 AM Y 0
9.25 7.4 PM Y 0
9.25 7.4 AM Y 0
10.25 8.2 PM Y 0
10.25 8.2 AM Y 0
10.25 8.2 PM Y 0
10.75 8.6 AM Y 0
10.75 8.6 PM Y 0
10.75 8.6 AM Y 0
10.75 8.6 PM Y 0
11.25 9 AM Y 0
11.25 9 PM Y 0
11.75 9.4 AM Y 0
11.75 9.4 PM Y 0
12.25 9.8 AM Y 0
14.25 11.4 PM Y 0
14.75 11.8 AM Y 0
15.25 12.2 PM Y 0
15.75 12.6 AM Y 0
16.75 13.4 PM Y 0

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Using the two-sample hypothesis test comparing old call time to new call time at a .05 level of significance, discuss the hypothesis test assumptions and tests used. Provide the test statistic and p-value in your response. Evaluate the results of the hypothesis test with the scenario. Provide recommendations for the vice president.

We have to use a two-sample hypothesis test comparing old call time to new call time at a .05 level of significance.

The assumptions for the test are:

(i) The sample is normally distributed

(ii) The sample is random and independent

We will perform the two-sample hypothesis test in Excel.

The hypothesis for testing is:

The null hypothesis, H0: µ1 = µ2

The sample average of the old call is the same as the new call.

The alternative hypothesis, Ha: µ1 ≠ µ2

The sample average of the old call is not the same as the new call.

Load the data into Excel.

Go to Data>Megastat.

Select the option Hypothesis tests and go to Compare Two Independent Samples.

Select the Group 1 and Group 2 as Old call time and New call time data set respectively.

Click OK.

The output obtained will be as follows:

Old Call Time New Call Time
11.067 8.853 mean
3.384 2.707 std. dev.
150 150 n
298 df
2.2133 difference (Old Call Time - New Call Time)
9.3885 pooled variance
3.0641 pooled std. dev.
0.3538 standard error of difference
0 hypothesized difference
6.256 t
1.37E-09 p-value (two-tailed)

The test statistic, tstat obtained from the output is 6.256 and p-value is 0.0000.

Since the p-value (0.0000) is less than the significance level(0.05), we can reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we have sufficient evidence to conclude that the sample average of the old call is not the same as the new call.

Thus, from the above result, we can recommend to the vice president that the new call time has a better impact and it is wise to maintain the system according to the new call time.

Using new call time and coded quality, develop a prediction equation for new call time. Evaluate the model and discuss the coefficient of determination, significance, and use the prediction equation to predict a call time if there is a defect.

Load the data into Excel.

Go to Data>Megastat.

Select the option Correlation/Regression and go to Regression.

Select Coded Quality as the independent variable, x.

Select New Call Time as the dependent variable, y.

Click OK.

The output will be as follows:

0.000 n   150
r   0.009 k   1
Std. Error   2.716 Dep. Var. New Call Time
ANOVA table
Source SS   df   MS F p-value
Regression 0.0920 1   0.0920 0.01 .9112
Residual 1,091.7213 148   7.3765
Total 1,091.8133 149  
Regression output confidence interval
variables coefficients std. error    t (df=148) p-value 95% lower 95% upper
Intercept 8.8448
Coded Quality 0.0802 0.7184 0.112 .9112 -1.3394 1.4998

The prediction equation for new call time is:

y = 8.8448 + 0.0808*x

Or

New Call Time = 8.8448 + 0.0808*Coded Quality

The coefficient of determination from the regression output, r2is 0.000.

Since the p-value for overall regression(0.9112) is greater than a reasonable significance level, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the model is not significant.

Since the p-value for coefficient Coded Quality(0.9112) is greater than a reasonable significance level, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the coefficient is not significant.

When there is a presence of a defect, then the value of Coded Quality will be equal to x =1 and the predicted value of the new call is:

y = 8.8448 + 0.0808*x

y = 8.8448 + 0.0808*1

y = 8.925

Evaluate whether the new call time meets customer specification. As stated in a previous lesson, customers indicated they did not want a call time longer than 7.5 minutes. Assume a standard deviation of 2 min is acceptable. Is the call center now meeting the customer specifications? If not where is the specification not being met? Explain your answers.

In order to test customer satisfaction when the average call duration is 7.5 minutes with a standard deviation of 2 min is acceptable. we want to introduce the Z test for customer satisfaction.

We have:

Sample size, n = 150

The sample mean, y = 8.925

The sample standard deviation, σ = 2

Population mean, µ = 7.5

The hypothesis for testing is:

The null hypothesis, H0: µ = 7.5

The customer call time is equal to 7.5 minutes.

The alternative hypothesis, Ha: µ1 < 7.5

The customer call time is less than 7.5 minutes.

Test statistic, z = (y - µ)/σ/√n

= (8.925 - 7.5)/2/√150

= 8.73

The p-value for z = 8.73 is 0.0000.

Since the p-value (0.0000) is less than a reasonable significance level, we can reject the null hypothesis. Thus, we can say that customer call time is less than 7.5 minutes.

Since the new call time is less than 7.5 minutes, the call center is now meeting the customer specifications.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Using the New Call Center Data, provide a summary report for the vice president including the...
Using the New Call Center Data, provide a summary report for the vice president including the following information Using new call time and coded quality, develop a prediction equation for new call time. Evaluate the model and discuss the coefficient of determination, significance, and use the prediction equation to predict a call time if there is a defect. Evaluate whether the new call time meets customer specification. As stated in a previous lesson, customers indicated they did not want a...
An important statistical measurement in service facilities (such as restaurants and banks) is the variability in...
An important statistical measurement in service facilities (such as restaurants and banks) is the variability in service times. As an experiment, two bank tellers were observed, and the service times for each of 100 customers were recorded. Do these data allow us to infer at the 5% significance level that the variance in service times differs between the two tellers? Estimate with 95% confidence the ratio of variances of the two bank tellers. Teller 1 Teller 2 7.2 10.9 5.4...
We want to compare the soil water content (% water by volume) of two fields growing...
We want to compare the soil water content (% water by volume) of two fields growing bell peppers. The claim is that the two fields have different soil water content. Use the data below to test the hypothesis that the fields have different soil water content. Field 1 is in list1 and Field 2 is in list2. We do not know whether the water content values are normally distributed or not, but their variances are equal. Provide your answers below....
Using α = 0.01, test that there was no relationship between survival and group size. State...
Using α = 0.01, test that there was no relationship between survival and group size. State the null and alternative hypotheses. Report the value of the appropriate test statistic, the distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis, and the P-value of the test to answer the question. State your conclusion. Data: Contingency table results: Rows: Group Size Columns: Survival Cell format Count (Row percent) (Column percent) (Percent of total) Died Survived Total 1 13 (81.25%) (32.5%) (14.94%) 3...
Use the given data set to complete parts? (a) through? (c) below.? (Use alphaequals?0.05.) x 10...
Use the given data set to complete parts? (a) through? (c) below.? (Use alphaequals?0.05.) x 10 8 13 9 11 14 6 4 12 7 5 y 9.14 8.13 8.75 8.77 9.26 8.11 6.13 3.11 9.13 7.27 4.74 LOADING... Click here to view a table of critical values for the correlation coefficient. a. Construct a scatterplot. Choose the correct graph below. A. 0 4 8 12 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 x y A scatterplot has a horizontal...
please see experiment information below (a) According to your experimental data, what volume of C6H8O7 represents...
please see experiment information below (a) According to your experimental data, what volume of C6H8O7 represents the half-equivalence (a.k.a. half-neutralization) point in this titration? (b) What is the pH of the solution at the half-neutralization point? Mass of Beaker (Step 1; g) Mass of Beaker + Citric Acid (Step 3; g) Mass of Citric Acid (Step 1 - Step 3; g) Mass of Beaker + Citric Acid After Cooling (Step 7; g) Molarity of Citric Acid Solution (M) 108.7 110.7...
Use the given data set to complete parts​ (a) through​ (c) below.​ (Use alphaαequals=​0.05.) x 1010...
Use the given data set to complete parts​ (a) through​ (c) below.​ (Use alphaαequals=​0.05.) x 1010 88 1313 99 1111 1414 66 44 1212 77 55 y 7.467.46 6.766.76 12.7412.74 7.117.11 7.827.82 8.848.84 6.086.08 5.385.38 8.168.16 6.436.43 5.735.73 LOADING... Click here to view a table of critical values for the correlation coefficient. a. Construct a scatterplot. Choose the correct graph below. A. 04812160481216xy A scatterplot has a horizontal x-scale from 0 to 16 in increments of 2 and a vertical...
6. The data show the time intervals after an eruption​ (to the next​ eruption) of a...
6. The data show the time intervals after an eruption​ (to the next​ eruption) of a certain geyser. Find the regression​ equation, letting the first variable be the independent​ (x) variable. Find the best predicted time of the interval after an eruption given that the current eruption has a height of 149 feet. Height​ (ft) 108 124 108 152 109 138 137 103 Interval after​ (min) 77 73 81 87 69 91 90 68 What is the regression​ equation? ​...
Experiment 1: Titrations With Hot Taco Sauce and Ketchup Materials: (2) 250 mL Beakers 100 mL...
Experiment 1: Titrations With Hot Taco Sauce and Ketchup Materials: (2) 250 mL Beakers 100 mL Beaker (waste beaker) 30 mL Syringe Syringe stopcock 100 mL Graduated cylinder Funnel Stir rod Ring stand Ring Clamp pH meter Scale 20 mL 0.1M NaOH 2 Ketchup packets 2 Hot sauce packets *90 mL Distilled water *Scissors *Computer Access *Access to a Graphing Software *Procedure for creating this solution provided in the "Before You Begin..." section (located at the beginning of the manual)....
See experiment info below The NaOH used in this lab should have been 0.1M, since you...
See experiment info below The NaOH used in this lab should have been 0.1M, since you were to make it as such (see Step 15 in lab document). Compare your standardized average molarity of NaOH in this lab to 0.1M. How do the values compare? How close was your NaOH dilution to actually being 0.1M NaOH? Calculate your percent error against the average standardized value from this lab. (You must show all work to receive credit.) step 15- Prepare an...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT