3. A candy bar manufacturer is interested in estimating sales using price of the candy bar in different cities. To do this the manufacturer randomly selected 6 small cities and offered the candy at different price. Using candy bar sales as dependent variable, the manufacturer will conduct simple regression using the data below:
Price (X) Sales (Y) XY X² Y²
1.3 100 130 1.69 10000
1.6 90 144 2.56 8100
1.8 90 162 3.24 8100
2 40 80 4 1600
2.4 38 91.2 5.76 1444
3.5 20 70 12.25 400
Total 12.6 378 677.2 29.5 29644
?̂=143.55−38.36? ???=1357.77
Using above information:
a. The price of candy in a city is $3.50. What is the sale estimate for the city?
b. Compute the standard error of the estimate.
c. Compute the coefficient of determination r² and interpret it meaning in this problem.
d. At a significance level of .01 can you conclude that the Price is a good predictor of the Sales.
a. The price of candy in a city is $3.50. What is the sale estimate for the city?
y = 143.55−38.36*3.50
y = 9.29
b. Compute the standard error of the estimate.
The standard error of the estimate is 18.424.
c. Compute the coefficient of determination r² and interpret it meaning in this problem.
r² = 0.767
76.7% of the variation in the model is explained.
d. At a significance level of .01 can you conclude that the Price is a good predictor of the Sales.
The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: β1 = 0
H1: β1 ≠ 0
The p-value is 0.0222.
Since the p-value (0.0222) is greater than the significance level (0.01), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we cannot conclude that the Price is a good predictor of the Sales.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.