The Better Business Bureau (BBB) tested the life of 35 diabetes test meters; and found them to last an average of 1450 hours with a standard deviation of 100 hours. The company that produces these meters claims that they last 1500 hours on average. The BBB knows that the population is normally distributed, and traditionally uses a significance level of 5%. Does the BBB have enough evidence to claim that these test meters have a shorter lifespan than the manufacturer claims they do?
Please type in the Critical Value(s) ,
the Test Statistic ,
and the result of the test
H0: >= 1500
Ha: < 1500
Test Criteria :-
Reject null hypothesis if t < -t(α, n-1)
Critical value t(α, n-1) = t(0.05 , 35-1) = -1.691
Test Statistic :-
t = ( X̅ - µ ) / (S / √(n) )
t = ( 1450 - 1500 ) / ( 100 / √(35) )
t = -2.958
t < - t(α, n-1) = -2.958 < - 1.691
Result :- Reject null hypothesis
We have sufficient evidence to support the claim that these test meters have a shorter lifespan than
the manufacturer claims they do.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.