Suppose a mutual fund qualifies as having moderate risk if the standard deviation of its monthly rate of return is less than 6%. A mutual-fund rating agency randomly selects 28 months and determines the rate of return for a certain fund. The standard deviation of the rate of return is computed to be 4.37%. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the fund has moderate risk at the alpha equals 0.05 level of significance? A normal probability plot indicates that the monthly rates of return are normally distributed.
given data are:-
sample size (n) = 28
sample sd (s) = 4.37% = 0.0437
hypothesis:-
our claim is the alternative hypothesis.
the test statistic be:-
degrees of freedom = (n-1) = (28-1) = 27
p value be:-
[ in any blank cell of excel type =CHISQ.DIST(14.3227,27,TRUE) preee enter]
decision:-
p value = 0.0221 <0.05 (alpha)
so, we reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion:-
there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the fund has moderate risk at the alpha equals 0.05 level of significance.
*** if you have any doubt regarding the problem please write it in the comment box.if you are satisfied please give me a LIKE if possible...
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.