On the basis of this test, what is your conclusion, assuming the significance level is = 0.05? Is the mean platelet yield greater than 3.9 x 10? Is the Amicus machine more efficient than the other machine?
One-Sample Statistics |
||||
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
|
Platelet Yield |
16 |
4.0063 |
.50394 |
.12599 |
One-Sample Test |
||||||
Test Value = 3.9 |
||||||
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Mean Difference |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
||
Lower |
Upper |
|||||
Platelet Yield |
.843 |
15 |
.412 |
.10625 |
-.1623 |
.3748 |
Null hypothesis H0: Mean platelet yield is equal to 3.9
Alternative hypothesis H0: Mean platelet yield greater than 3.9
The p-value of the one sample test is 0.412.
Since, p-value is greater than 0.05 significance level, we fail to reject null hypothesis H0 and conclude that there is no strong evidence that mean platelet yield greater than 3.9. Thus, there is no significant evidence from the given data that Amicus machine is more efficient than the other machine.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.