Question

Although there is not a lot of data available as of yet, scientists approximate that the...

Although there is not a lot of data available as of yet, scientists approximate that the coronavirus diagnostic test has a probability of 0.95 of giving a positive result when testing a person with the virus and a probability 0.10 of giving a false positive when testing a person without the virus. Assuming 0.01 % of the population are sufferers, calculate the probability that someone does not have the virus, given that they have tested negative.

which one is correct

0.977775

0.988886

0.999994

0.999997

1

Homework Answers

Answer #1

We are given here that:
P(+ | disease) = 0.95, therefore P(- | disease) = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05
Also as the probability of false positive is 0.1, therefore,
P( + | no disease) = 0.1, therefore P( - | no disease) = 1 - 0.1 = 0.9

Also, as 0.01 % of the population are sufferers,

Therefore P( disease ) = 0.0001

Using law of total probability, we have here:
P(-) = P(- | disease) P( disease ) + P( - | no disease)P(no disease)
= 0.05*0.0001 + 0.9*(1 - 0.0001)

= 0.899915

Using bayes theorem, we have here:
P( no disease | -) =  P(- | no disease) P( no disease ) / P(-)

= 0.9*(1 - 0.0001) / 0.899915

= 0.999994

Therefore 0.999994 is the required probability here.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
3. A diagnostic test has 95% sensitivity (the probability a person with the condition tests positive...
3. A diagnostic test has 95% sensitivity (the probability a person with the condition tests positive = 0.95) and 95% specificity (the probability a person without the condition tests negative = 0.95). In a population of people given the test, 1% of the people have the condition (probability a person has the condition = 0.01). (a) What proportion of the people will test positive? (b) Given a person has tested positive, what is the probability he/she has the condition?
Suppose that the fraction of infected people in a city is p = 0.01. 100 people...
Suppose that the fraction of infected people in a city is p = 0.01. 100 people from the city board a small cruise. You can assume that the people are unrelated to each other and randomly chosen so that each person is infected independently with probability p. You can also ignore the possibility that they infect each other while boarding. Suppose that the virus test gives negative when the person has the virus with probability 0.2, and gives negative when...
Suppose that the fraction of infected people in a city is p = 0.01. 100 people...
Suppose that the fraction of infected people in a city is p = 0.01. 100 people from the city board a small cruise. You can assume that the people are unrelated to each other and randomly chosen so that each person is infected independently with probability p. You can also ignore the possibility that they infect each other while boarding. Suppose that the virus test gives negative when the person has the virus with probability 0.2, and gives negative when...
A diagnostic test carried out during mobile health service program in a community, has indicated that...
A diagnostic test carried out during mobile health service program in a community, has indicated that there is a 71% and 77% chance of giving a positive result when applied to persons suffering from diabetes and cancer, and a 37% and 37% chance of giving a positive (i.e. false) result when applied on non-sufferers of diabetes and cancers. It is estimated that there is 42% and 55% chances that the persons in a particular society are suffering from diabetes and...
12. A diagnostic test has a probability0.95 of giving a positive result when applied to a...
12. A diagnostic test has a probability0.95 of giving a positive result when applied to a person suffering from a certain disease, and a probability0.10 of giving a (false) positive when applied to a non-sufferer. It is estimated that 0.5 % of the population are sufferers. Suppose that the test is now administered to a person about whom we have no relevant information relating to the disease (apart from the fact that he/she comes from this population). Calculate the following...
An early COVID-19 serology showed an approximate sensitivity and specificity consistent with the table below. Although...
An early COVID-19 serology showed an approximate sensitivity and specificity consistent with the table below. Although unknown, a 5% prevalence of COVID-19 was assumed. SARS-CoV-2 Present SARS-CoV-2 Absent Test positive 47 18 Test negative 3 432 a. Based on the table, what is the sensitivity of the test? b. Based on the above table, what is the estimated negative predictive value (NPV) for the test? c. How would you interpret the above NPV number for someone unfamiliar with epidemiology and...
In a pandemic respiratory infectious disease caused by a virus A, the diagnostic test has been...
In a pandemic respiratory infectious disease caused by a virus A, the diagnostic test has been developed and carried out. Under this test when an individual actually has the disease with a positive result (true-positive test) occurs with the probability of 0.99, whereas an individual without the disease will show a positive test result (false-positive test) with the probability of 0.02. What is more, scientists have shown that 1 out of 1000 adults is confirmed positive and has this disease....
There is a medicine to check if you have a lovesick. When tested on a person...
There is a medicine to check if you have a lovesick. When tested on a person with a lovesick with this drug, the probability of being positive is 0.95 (95%). And the probability of being positive is 0.1 (10%) without getting lovesick. The number of people with lovesickness is 0.5%. Find the following probabilities: (a) What is the probability that the test will produce positive results? (b) If the test results are positive, what is the probability that the person...
The Food and Drug Administration does not regulate these tests, but White House coronavirus task force...
The Food and Drug Administration does not regulate these tests, but White House coronavirus task force coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx has said that she expects manufacturers to achieve a standard of 90% specificity (and 90% sensitivity, another measure of test performance that's less important in this context). Here's what would happen if you used a test with 90% specificity in a population in which only 1% of the people have coronavirus. Nobody knows for sure, but that could be the...
Part 1: Diagnostic tests of medical conditions can have several results. 1) The patient has the...
Part 1: Diagnostic tests of medical conditions can have several results. 1) The patient has the condition and the test is positive (+)             2) The patient has the condition and the test is negative (-) – Known as “false negative” 3) The patient doesn’t have the condition and the test is negative (-) 4) The patient doesn’t have the condition and the test is positive (+) – Known as “false positive” Consider the following:         Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT