Question

In January 2014, the “polar vortex” swept across the eastern US leading some media outlets to claim this was the “coldest weather in decades” in Baltimore between Jan 6 & Jan 8. It turns out that only 5 years prior, in 2009, Jan 15 – Jan 17 were 5 degrees colder in Baltimore than the coldest temperatures in 2014. Why did these media outlets say it was the “coldest weather in decades”? Many statisticians say that it is a mistake to look at weather temperature records the way that media outlets looked at the Baltimore "record"; why do you think they say this is a "mistake"?

Answer 1

Answer:

1.

The news sources regularly know to distort the reality, which turns out due to two significant reasons, the lacking learning of the subject, or attempting to get more watchers / pursues by siphoning up the story.

For this situation, the news sources took the most reduced temperature, while disregarding the normal for the period, along these lines they utilized it to state that it was the coldest period in the most recent decades.

Additionally, by utilizing the title that it was the coldest climate in decades, the individuals are consequently activated to understand it, along these lines the media will get more turnout.

2.

The analysts then again, couldn't help contradicting the cases of the news sources. The explanation behind this was the news sources were taking in thought just a solitary most reduced least.

That isn't the way wherein the most minimal temperature in a given period is determined, yet it is the normal for of the temperatures for the given time frame that give a legitimate picture about the climate conditions.