Question

Assume that there are two different TV ads showing repeatedly in October, and both criticize a...

Assume that there are two different TV ads showing repeatedly in October, and both criticize a candidate.


A researcher does a study to verify her theory that people who saw the TV Ads that contain HARSH criticisms of the candidate will rate the candidate lower than people who saw ads with MILD criticism of the candidate.


Suppose the researcher picks at random 4 voters from among all voters who have already seen MILD ad only. Then she also picks 4 voters at random from among all voters who have already seen the HARSH ad only. She has each voter rate the candidate on a scale from 0 to 25.


Results are shown below.

TYPE OF AD RATING OF CANDIDATE
Mild 10
Mild 14
Mild 18
Mild 23
Harsh 6
Harsh 8
Harsh 12
Harsh 17

Flag this Question
Question 1210 pts

What is “TYPE OF AD”?

Group of answer choices
An ordinal scale variable
A score on an interval scale variable
A score on a nominal scale variable
A score on an ordinal scale variable
A nominal scale variable
Flag this Question
Question 1310 pts

If one of the voters above was chosen at random what would be your best estimate of the voter’s RATING?

Group of answer choices
13.5
13.0
12.5
14.0
12.0
Flag this Question
Question 1410 pts

If you knew the voter saw the HARSH ad, what would your best estimate of the RATING for that voter be?

Group of answer choices
7.75
11.75
8.75
9.75
10.75
Flag this Question
Question 1510 pts

If you know the TYPE OF AD, how much would you have to adjust the best estimate for RATING for voters who saw a MILD ad?

Group of answer choices
+3.75
-3.75
0.00
+2.75
-2.75

Homework Answers

Answer #1

12. "TYPE OF AD" is an ordinal scale variable, because it is a nominal variable and also has an order (Harsh/mild)

13. If one of the voters above was chosen at random the best estimate of the score would be the average of the scores: 13.5 . This is because each score is equally likely to be picked. Hence the expected score is the average score.

14. If we knew the voter saw the HARSH ad, then the best estimate of the RATING for that voter would be average of the scores 6,8,12,17: 10.75. Thisis becuse each of the Harsh scores is equally probable to be picked up and hence the expected score is the average score.

15. If we knew the type of the AD, the best estimate would be 16.25 for mild and 10.75 for Harsh ad. If the AD is mild, adjustment is 0 and if the AD is harsh, adjustment would be +(16.25-10.75) = +5.5

Average adjustment = (0+5.5)/2 = +2.75

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Dr. Bunson Honeydew and Dr. Strangepork both wanted to know how effective TV ads were at...
Dr. Bunson Honeydew and Dr. Strangepork both wanted to know how effective TV ads were at persuading the public to vote for Presidential candidates. Dr. Bunson Honeydew conducted a laboratory experiment where subjects (primarily students) were invited into a lab to watch a sitcom pilot.  They first took a survey mostly about TV show preferences, but that also measured their pre-existing political attitudes.  The subjects then sat down to watch the sitcom.  The advertisements shown during the commercial breaks were randomly assigned to...
As you saw from the lab PowerPoint slides last week, you will be doing a research...
As you saw from the lab PowerPoint slides last week, you will be doing a research study looking at ‘Aggression Priming” for your first paper. For this week’s discussion, I want you to discuss with your group what you think this study is about. What is the hypothesis? What theory does it come from? What do you predict will happen (do you expect something different than the hypothesis in the researcher instructions? If so, what and why?)? Do you think...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From the April 2004 Issue Save Share 8.95 In 1991, Progressive Insurance, an automobile insurer based in Mayfield Village, Ohio, had approximately $1.3 billion in sales. By 2002, that figure had grown to $9.5 billion. What fashionable strategies did Progressive employ to achieve sevenfold growth in just over a decade? Was it positioned in a high-growth industry? Hardly. Auto insurance is a mature, 100-year-old industry...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...