You are looking for a way to incentivize the sales reps that you
are in charge of. You design an incentive plan as a way to help
increase in their sales. To evaluate this innovative plan, you take
a random sample of your reps, and their weekly incomes before and
after the plan were recorded. You calculate the difference in
income as (after incentive plan - before incentive plan). You
perform a paired samples t-test with the following hypotheses: Null
Hypothesis: μD ≤ 0, Alternative Hypothesis:
μD> 0. You calculate a p-value of 0.0236. What is the
appropriate conclusion of your test?
Question 12 options:
|
1)
|
The average difference in weekly income is significantly
different from 0. There is a significant difference in weekly
income due to the incentive plan. |
|
|
2)
|
The average difference in weekly income is significantly larger
than 0. The average weekly income was higher after the incentive
plan. |
|
|
3)
|
We did not find enough evidence to say there was a
significantly positive average difference in weekly income. The
incentive plan does not appear to have been effective. |
|
|
4)
|
The average difference in weekly income is significantly less
than 0. The average weekly income was higher before the incentive
plan. |
|
|
5)
|
The average difference in weekly income is less than or equal
to 0. |
|
Consumers Energy states that the average electric bill across
the state is $48.9. You want to test the claim that the average
bill amount is actually greater than $48.9. The hypotheses for this
situation are as follows: Null Hypothesis: μ ≤ 48.9, Alternative
Hypothesis: μ > 48.9. If the true statewide average bill is
$45.74 and the null hypothesis is rejected, did a type I, type II,
or no error occur?
Question 13 options:
|
1)
|
We do not know the p-value, so we cannot determine if an error
has occurred. |
|
|
2)
|
Type I Error has occurred. |
|
|
3)
|
We do not know the degrees of freedom, so we cannot determine
if an error has occurred. |
|
|
4)
|
Type II Error has occurred |
|
|
5)
|
No error has occurred. |
|
A medical researcher wants to determine if the average hospital
stay of patients that undergo a certain procedure is greater than
9.8 days. The hypotheses for this scenario are as follows: Null
Hypothesis: μ ≤ 9.8, Alternative Hypothesis: μ > 9.8. If the
actual mean is 26.9 days and the null hypothesis is not rejected,
did a type I, type II, or no error occur?
Question 14 options:
|
1)
|
Type I Error has occurred |
|
|
2)
|
No error has occurred. |
|
|
3)
|
We do not know the degrees of freedom, so we cannot determine
if an error has occurred. |
|
|
4)
|
We do not know the p-value, so we cannot determine if an error
has occurred. |
|
|
5)
|
Type II Error has occurred. |
|