Question

a researcher conducts a hypothesis test to evaluate the effect of the treatment. the hypothesis test...

a researcher conducts a hypothesis test to evaluate the effect of the treatment. the hypothesis test produces a z-score of z= 2.75. Assuming that the researcher is using a two-tailed test,what decision should be made?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

solution:

this is the two tailed test .  

Test statistic = z=2.75

P(z >2.75 ) = 1 - P(z < 2.75 ) = 1-0.9970=0.0030 using z table

P-value = 2*0.0030=0.0060  

if

= 0.08

P-value <

Reject the null hypothesis .

if

= 0.05  

P-value >

fail to Reject the null hypothesis .

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
a researcher conducts a hypothesis test to evaluate the effect of the treatment that is expected...
a researcher conducts a hypothesis test to evaluate the effect of the treatment that is expected to increases scores. the hypothesis test produces a z-score of z= 2.75. if the researcher is using a one tailed test, what is the correct statistical decision?
A two-tailed hypothesis test is being used to evaluate a treatment effect with α = .05....
A two-tailed hypothesis test is being used to evaluate a treatment effect with α = .05. If the sample data produce a z-score statistic of z = -1.24, then what is the correct decision? Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the treatment has no effect. Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the treatment has an effect. Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the treatment has an effect. Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude...
Question #3 A researcher is conducting and experiment to evaluate a treatment that is expected to...
Question #3 A researcher is conducting and experiment to evaluate a treatment that is expected to increase the scores for individuals in a population. If the researcher uses a one-tailed test with ( a = .01), then which of the following correctly identifies the critical region? A. z > 2.33 B. z > 2.58 C. z < 2.33 D. z < 2.58 Question #4 A researcher evaluates a treatment effect using a two tailed hypothesis test with ( a =...
For your answers pick one *A researcher was interested in inspecting the effect of classical music...
For your answers pick one *A researcher was interested in inspecting the effect of classical music on stress among New York students. She studied a sample of 30 New York students. She found that z= -3.00. Using a = 0.5(two-tailed), what can she conclude? -Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that classical music has no effect on stress levels -Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that classical music has no effect on stress levels -Failed to reject the null hypothesis...
A researcher would like to evaluate the effect of a new cold medication on reaction time....
A researcher would like to evaluate the effect of a new cold medication on reaction time. It is known that under regular circumstances the distribution of reaction times is normal with µ = 200. A sample of n = 9 participants is obtained. Each person is given the new cold medication, and 1 hour later reaction time is measured for each individual. The average reaction time for this sample is M = 206 with SS = 648. The researcher would...
A researcher conducted a single-sample null hypothesis test with the z-statistic. The researcher reports that z...
A researcher conducted a single-sample null hypothesis test with the z-statistic. The researcher reports that z = +1.30. This z-statistic was calculated from sample data that was drawn from a normal population. The researcher sets α = .05 and uses a two-tailed test. On the basis of his data, the researcher decides to fail to reject the null hypothesis. Did the researcher make the correct decision or did he make an error? If he made an error, what type of...
research hypothesis stating the treatment effect in contrast to the statement of null effect alternative hypothesis...
research hypothesis stating the treatment effect in contrast to the statement of null effect alternative hypothesis central limit theorem sampling bias two-tailed test upper probability value allowed for rejecting the null hypothesis significance level parameter type 1 error two-tailed test drawing conclusions about a population from sample data empirical data inferential statistics discrete distribution random sampling Assume that a new treatment for helping alcoholics isn't any better than an old treatment. A researcher, who doesn't know this, designs a study...
A researcher predicts that scores in treatment A will be higher than scores in treatment B....
A researcher predicts that scores in treatment A will be higher than scores in treatment B. If the mean for the 8 participants in treatment A is 4 points higher than the mean for the 8 participants in treatment B and the data produce t = 1.652, what decision should be made? Show steps. a. With a = .05, fail to reject H0 for either a one-tailed or a two-tailed test b. With a = .05, reject H0 for either...
1. After summarizing data collected to test a null hypothesis (e.g., observing z as a test...
1. After summarizing data collected to test a null hypothesis (e.g., observing z as a test statistic), a researcher fails to reject the null hypothesis (p > .05). The researcher then concludes that there is no treatment effect (treatment does not affect variation on the DV). Is this a correct conclusion? a. yes, it is correct b. no, it is incorrect; a decision to fail to reject the null hypothesis results in ignorance about a treatment effect 35. Consider z...
if a hypothesis test produces a z score in the critical region what decision should be...
if a hypothesis test produces a z score in the critical region what decision should be made?
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT