Question

a researcher conducts a hypothesis test to evaluate the effect of the treatment. the hypothesis test produces a z-score of z= 2.75. Assuming that the researcher is using a two-tailed test,what decision should be made?

Answer #1

solution:

this is the two tailed test .

Test statistic = z=2.75

P(z >2.75 ) = 1 - P(z < 2.75 ) = 1-0.9970=0.0030 using z table

P-value = 2*0.0030=0.0060

if

= 0.08

P-value <

Reject the null hypothesis .

if

= 0.05

P-value >

fail to Reject the null hypothesis .

a researcher conducts a hypothesis test to evaluate the effect
of the treatment that is expected to increases scores. the
hypothesis test produces a z-score of z= 2.75. if the researcher is
using a one tailed test, what is the correct statistical
decision?

A two-tailed hypothesis test is being used to evaluate a
treatment effect with α = .05. If the sample data produce a z-score
statistic of z = -1.24, then what is the correct decision?
Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the treatment has
no effect.
Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the treatment has
an effect.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the
treatment has an effect.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude...

Question #3
A researcher is conducting and experiment to evaluate a
treatment that is expected to increase the scores for individuals
in a population. If the researcher uses a one-tailed test with ( a
= .01), then which of the following correctly identifies the
critical region?
A. z > 2.33
B. z > 2.58
C. z < 2.33
D. z < 2.58
Question #4
A researcher evaluates a treatment effect using a two tailed
hypothesis test with ( a =...

For your answers pick one
*A researcher was interested in inspecting the effect of
classical music on stress among New York students. She studied a
sample of 30 New York students. She found that z= -3.00. Using a =
0.5(two-tailed), what can she conclude?
-Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that classical music
has no effect on stress levels
-Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that classical music has
no effect on stress levels
-Failed to reject the null hypothesis...

A researcher would like to evaluate the effect of a new cold
medication on reaction time. It is known that under regular
circumstances the distribution of reaction times is normal with µ =
200. A sample of n = 9 participants is obtained. Each
person is given the new cold medication, and 1 hour later reaction
time is measured for each individual. The average reaction time for
this sample is M = 206 with SS = 648. The
researcher would...

A researcher conducted a single-sample null hypothesis test with
the z-statistic. The researcher reports that z = +1.30. This
z-statistic was calculated from sample data that was drawn from a
normal population. The researcher sets α = .05 and uses a
two-tailed test. On the basis of his data, the researcher decides
to fail to reject the null hypothesis. Did the researcher make the
correct decision or did he make an error? If he made an error, what
type of...

research hypothesis stating the treatment effect in contrast to
the statement of null effect
alternative hypothesis
central limit theorem
sampling bias
two-tailed test
upper probability value allowed for rejecting the null
hypothesis
significance level
parameter
type 1 error
two-tailed test
drawing conclusions about a population from sample data
empirical data
inferential statistics
discrete distribution
random sampling
Assume that a new treatment for helping alcoholics isn't any
better than an old treatment. A researcher, who doesn't know this,
designs a study...

A researcher predicts that scores in treatment A will be higher
than scores in treatment B. If the mean for the 8 participants in
treatment A is 4 points higher than the mean for the 8
participants in treatment B and the data produce t =
1.652, what decision should be made? Show steps.
a.
With a = .05, fail to reject H0 for either a
one-tailed or a two-tailed test
b.
With a = .05, reject H0 for either...

1. After summarizing data collected to test a null hypothesis
(e.g., observing z as a test statistic), a researcher fails to
reject the null hypothesis (p > .05). The researcher then
concludes that there is no treatment effect (treatment does not
affect variation on the DV).
Is this a correct conclusion?
a. yes, it is correct
b. no, it is incorrect; a decision to fail to reject the null
hypothesis results in ignorance about a treatment effect
35. Consider z...

2) Imagine a researcher conducts a one-tailed test and finds a
significant test result at z = 1.82
a. Explain why a two-tailed test is generally preferred to a
one-tailed test.
b. Explain your concerns about this researcher's significant
finding.
c. What might have been a better way to change this experiment
to achieve the desired results?

ADVERTISEMENT

Get Answers For Free

Most questions answered within 1 hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

asked 2 minutes ago

asked 19 minutes ago

asked 20 minutes ago

asked 40 minutes ago

asked 45 minutes ago

asked 49 minutes ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago