An educational psychologist wants to know if length of time and
type of training affect learning simple fractions. Fifth graders
were randomly selected and assigned to different times (from 1 to 3
hours) and different teaching conditions (old method vs. meaningful
method). All students were then tested on the "fractions" subtest
of a standard arithmetic test. What can the psychologist conclude
with α = 0.01?
Time | |||
Train | one hr | two hrs | three hrs |
old | 5 6 7 |
6 7 7 |
8 9 10 |
meaningful | 6 7 11 |
9 10 11 |
7 9 10 |
Using the SPSS results, compute the
corresponding effect size(s) and indicate magnitude(s).
Train: η2
= ; ---Select--- na trivial effect
small effect medium effect large effect
Time: η2
= ; ---Select--- na trivial effect
small effect medium effect large effect
Interaction: η2
= ; ---Select--- na trivial effect
small effect medium effect large effect
Applying ANOVA:
Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
train | 12.5000 | 1 | 12.5000 | 5.9211 | 0.0315 | 9.3302 |
Time | 10.7778 | 2 | 5.3889 | 2.5526 | 0.1192 | 6.9266 |
Interaction | 10.3333 | 2 | 5.1667 | 2.4474 | 0.1284 | 6.9266 |
Within | 25.3333 | 12 | 2.1111 | |||
Total | 58.9444 | 17 |
Train: η2 = 12.5/58.9444 =0.2120 , medium effect
Time: η2 =10.7778/25.3333 =0.1828 , medium effect
Interaction: η2 = 10.3333/58.9444 , medium effect
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.