Question

In a certain country 30% are seniors, and 40% of the seniors are vitamin D deficient,...

In a certain country 30% are seniors, and 40% of the seniors are vitamin D deficient, and among the non-seniors, 20% are vitamin D deficient. If a person is chosen randomly, let X be the age (1=senior, 2=not senior), and let Y be the vitamin D status (1=deficient, 2=not deficient).

(a) Let πij = P(X=i;Y=j). Obtain the table for the joint probabilities {πij}

(b) Find the odds for vitamin D deficiency among seniors and among non-seniors. Also obtain the odds ratio for vitamin deficiency for seniors to non-seniors. Interpret this odds ratio.

(c) Are age and vitamin D status independent? Explain your answer.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Given: Pr(Senior) = 0.3 and Pr(Non-senior) = 0.7

(a)  Let πij = P(X=i;Y=j).The joint probability table can be constructed as follows:

Here, The marginal probabilites of seniors and non seniors are 0.3 and 0.7 respectively, as given in the data.Next, it is given that  40% of the seniors are vitamin D deficient, i,e 40% of 30% are vitamin D deficient.So, seniors being vitamin D deficient has the probability 40% of 30% = 0.4 * 0.3 = 0.12.

Also,  among the non-seniors, 20% are vitamin D deficient, i.e. 20% of the 70%. So non seniors being vitamin D deficient has the probability 20% of 70% = 0.2 * 0.7 = 0.14.

The remaining probabilites for the 'Not deficient' class can be obtained by subtacting those for the 'Deficient class' from the marginal probabilities.

Seniors who are not vitamin D deficient = 0.3 - 0.12 = 0.18 Non seniors who are not vitamin D deficient = 0.7 - 0.14 = 0.56

(b) Odds  for vitamin D deficiency among seniors is nothing but the ratio of probability that the seniors are deficient to the probability that the seniors are not.

Odds for vitamin D deficiency among seniors:

Odds for vitamin D deficiency among seniors = Odds (Seniors) = Pr(Seniors are vitamin D deficient) / Pr(Seniors are not vitamin D deficient)

=

Odds for vitamin D deficiency among non seniors = Odds ( Non seniors)

= Pr (Non seniors are vitamin D deficient) /Pr(Non seniors are not vitamin D deficient) =   

Odds ratio is nothing but ratio of Odds (Seniors) to the Odds ( Non seniors) =

The figure 2.667 implies that, for seniors, the odds of being vitamin D deficient are 2.667 times larger than that for non seniors.

(c) We know that Odds ratio of 1 indicates that the 2 factors, here, Age and Vitamin D status are independent.But here, the odds ratio is significantly different from 1.

Also, the factors in the contingency table are independent if the joint probability is equal to the product of their marginal probabilities.

Here, P(Seniors and Deficient) = 0.12 P(Seniors) *P(Deficient) = (0.3)(0.26) = 0.078  

Since,  P(Seniors and Deficient)   P(Seniors) *P(Deficient), it is evident that Age and Vitamin Status are dependent.

Similarly,  P(Non seniors and Deficient)   P(Non seniors) *P(Deficient) P(Seniors and Not deficient)   P(Seniors) *P(Not deficient)   P(Non seniors and Not deficient)   P(Non seniors) *P(Not deficient)

Hence Age and Vitamin D status are not dependent.

  

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Recent research indicated that about 30​% of children in a certain country are deficient in vitamin...
Recent research indicated that about 30​% of children in a certain country are deficient in vitamin D. A company that sells vitamin D supplements tests 330 elementary school children in one area of the country. Use a Normal approximation to find the probability that no more than 85 of them have vitamin D deficiency. The probability is approximately nothing. ​(Round to three decimal places as​ needed.)
Pregnant women were recruited during their first trimester to study the relationship between chocolate consumption during...
Pregnant women were recruited during their first trimester to study the relationship between chocolate consumption during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia (pregnancy-induced hypertension). They were interviewed about chocolate consumption, age, race, education, smoking, body mass index, and previous pregnancy history. Participants were re-interviewed after delivery to obtain information on chocolate consumption during the third trimester of pregnancy. In addition, umbilical cord blood was collected at the time of delivery and measured for concentration of theobromine (the major metabolite of chocolate)....
In narrative essay format, I want you to address a business/organization case study using multiple concepts...
In narrative essay format, I want you to address a business/organization case study using multiple concepts from class. The case question and case text begin on page 5 of this document. You need to demonstrate their best understanding of management and organizational behavior theory, and the application of those ideas to improve the understanding of various issues. You need to clearly identify at least 3 distinct, substantive issues. For each issue you need to 1), identify evidence from the case...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...