Two proposed advertising campaigns themes for a new product are being evaluated for effectiveness. A random sample of 120 consumers is exposed to theme A, and another sample of 100 consumers is exposed to theme B. The study asks each customer whether they have a positive opinion of the product.
Is there enough evidence to support the claim that theme A is a more effective campaign than theme B, with an a = 5% level of significance?
Let
We are testing :
We know that :
Now, we are given that :
Thus, the value of the test statistic :
Now, the test here is right tailed, thus the critical region lies in the right tail.
We find the 5% point (from the right) of the standard normal distribution and we get:
z0.05 = 1.644854
Since, the value of the test statistic is greater than the critical point, we reject H0 : pA = pB and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that theme A is more effective campaign than theme B at 5% level of significance.
For any queries, feel free to comment and ask.
If the solution was helpful to you, don't forget to upvote it by clicking on the 'thumbs up' button.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.