Two randomly selected groups of citizens were exposed to
different media campaigns that dealt with the image of a political
candidate. One week later, the citizen groups were surveyed to see
whether they would vote for the candidate. The results were as
follows. Is there sufficient evidence to show a difference in the
effectiveness of the two image campaigns at the 0.05 level of
significance? (Use Conservative - Moderate.)
Exposed to Conservative Image Exposed to Moderate
Image
Number in Sample 100 100
Proportion for the Candidate 0.38 0.50
(a) Find z. (Give your answer correct to two decimal
places.)
(ii) Find the p-value. (Give your answer correct to four decimal
places.)
(b) State the appropriate conclusion:
Reject the null hypothesis, there is significant evidence to show a
difference in effectiveness.
Reject the null hypothesis, there is not significant evidence to
show a difference in effectiveness.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is not significant
evidence to show a difference in effectiveness.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is significant evidence
to show a difference in effectiveness.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.