Question

how do third variables or extraneous variables show that correlation does not equal causation?

how do third variables or extraneous variables show that correlation does not equal causation?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation tells us how strongly the pair of variables x and y are linearly related and change together. It does not tell us why and how behind the relationship.

The third variable or extraneous variable z which can influence both x and y separately can make it such and x and y are cause of one for the other, whereas in actual fact it is not so.

For example,

let

x = sale of ice cream

y = death due to drowning.

We can note a high positive correlation between x = sale of ice cream and y = death due to drowning. The actual fact is x is not the cause of y.

The reason is the presence of third variable z = hot weather which influences both x and y.

Since it very hot, ice cream sale increases.

Because of hot weather, people go into water games, causing death due to drowning.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
What are the extraneous variables? What are the extraneous variables in PICOT question, In primary healthcare...
What are the extraneous variables? What are the extraneous variables in PICOT question, In primary healthcare workers who take care of COVID 19 patients, how does the use of surgical mask compared to the respirator mask prevent COVID-type respiratory illnesses during the entire duration of rendering patient care? How can we control extraneous variables.
When does correlation not imply causation?
When does correlation not imply causation?
If two variables have a high correlation with a third variable (asthma) does this explain the...
If two variables have a high correlation with a third variable (asthma) does this explain the any correlation?
Does correlation mean the same thing as causation? In other words, if there exists a strong...
Does correlation mean the same thing as causation? In other words, if there exists a strong correlation between two variables, does that necessarily mean that one variable causes the other? Support your answer with examples.
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe Can you help me understand how to answer this question
The adage in psychology is that “correlation does not imply causation.” However, we know that smoking...
The adage in psychology is that “correlation does not imply causation.” However, we know that smoking cigarettes causes cancer, despite the fact that most of the evidence for this is correlational. Provide an example of a hypothetical study where correlation does not imply causation and what the researcher can do to further understand the nature of the correlation.
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe. an orginal post please
One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the...
One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the variables must be causally related to the other. True or False.
Explain how and why Correlation is NOT Causation.
Explain how and why Correlation is NOT Causation.
One hears versions of the expression "correlation does not mean causation" so often - especially as...
One hears versions of the expression "correlation does not mean causation" so often - especially as a graduate student - that it can be easy to accept the statement as true without giving the matter some careful consideration. Is it ALWAYS true that correlation does not imply (or suggest) causation? Does correlation NEVER imply (or suggest) causation? Are there any conditions under which we might have good reason to think that a causal relationship does exist on the basis of...