Sex | Sports | Popularity | Grades |
Boys | 60 | 50 | 117 |
Girls | 30 | 91 | 130 |
Sports | Popularity | Grades |
Proportion of boys who selected each category. | 0.2643171806 | 0.2202643172 | 0.5154185022 |
Proportion of girls who selected each category | 0.1195219124 | 0.3625498008 | 0.5179282869 |
1)if goals were contingent on district type. Was there any difference in the goals of students from rural, urban, or suburban areas?
Create an observed frequency table using the raw data and calculate Χ2. Χ2 =
Hint: I counted up the observed frequencies for the Sex X Goals contingency table and gave you a table that summarized the results. Now you will need to do this to make a District X Goals contingency table. Use the data in the 'Raw Data' worksheet to make your table. Most spreadsheet programs will tell you the total number of cells selected at the bottom or in a pop-up box near the cursor. If you sort all the data by district and then use this feature it will be much faster than actually counting every cell by hand. If you can't find it then you can also use the =COUNT() function and select all the cells for a district. If you run into any trouble please let me know.
2)How many degrees of freedom do you have for this test?
3)Based on our results, we should:
reject the null hypothesis; goals were contingent on district type |
||
fail to reject the null hypothesis; goals were not contingent on district type |
4)Chase and Dummer claimed that approximately 1/3 of their sample came from each district type. Let's use a goodness-of-fit test to see if there was a significant difference in the number of children from each district. Based on our results we can say:
Hint 1: your observed frequencies for this chi-square should be your row or column totals (depending on how you organized your table) for the last test
Hint 2: for goodness of fit you have to use the bottom table on the website
There was no significant difference in the number of children from each district. |
||
There was a significant difference, but we can't tell which district was significant different from other districts. |
||
There was significantly more children from the Urban district than from any other district. |
||
There was significantly less children from the Rural district than any other district. |
5)
If we have multiple IVs and we want to know if one IV is contingent on another IV then the Chi-square variant we need to do is called:
within-subjects |
||
goodness-of-fit |
||
contingency-tables |
||
none of the above |
Rows: C1 Columns: Worksheet columns
sports | popularity | grades | All | |
Boys | 60 | 50 | 117 | 227 |
Expected count | 42.74 | 66.96 | 117.30 | |
Girls | 30 | 91 | 130 | 251 |
Expected count | 47.26 | 74.04 | 129.70 | |
All | 90 | 141 | 247 | 478 |
Cell Contents
Count
Expected count
Chi-Square Test
Chi-Square | DF | P-Value | |
Pearson | 21.455 | 2 | 0.000 |
Likelihood Ratio | 21.769 | 2 | 0.000 |
1.
2. Df = (No. of rows-1)*(No. of columns -1) = 2*1 =2
3. reject the null hypothesis; goals were contingent on district type
Reason = P-value is less than 0.05
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.