The following table is a summary of randomly chosen student evaluations of faculty at a university over a three-year period. The researcher is interested in whether the distribution of evaluations differs by faculty rank.
Rank |
||||
Evaluation |
Assistant Professor |
Associate Professor |
Professor |
Total |
Above Average |
44 |
39 |
36 |
119 |
Below Average |
36 |
31 |
54 |
121 |
Total |
80 |
70 |
90 |
240 |
14. If faculty rank and evaluation are independent, how many assistant professors would have been expected to receive above average evaluations?
15. What's the value of the test statistic?
16. What's the critical value if the significance level is .05?
17. What's the p-value (any value in your range if you used a table)?
18. Do the data provide significant evidence at the .05 level that faculty rank and evaluation are dependent? Yes or no?
14)
expected assistant professors to receive above average evaluation =row total*column total/grand total=119*80/240=39.667
15)
applying chi square test:
Ei=row total*column total/grand total | Assistant | Associate | Professor | Total |
above | 39.667 | 34.71 | 44.63 | 119 |
below | 40.33 | 35.29 | 45.38 | 121 |
total | 80 | 70 | 90 | 240 |
=(Oi-Ei)2/Ei | Assistant | Associate | Professor | Total |
above | 0.4734 | 0.5307 | 1.6670 | 2.671 |
below | 0.4656 | 0.5219 | 1.6395 | 2.627 |
total | 0.939 | 1.053 | 3.306 | 5.298 |
test statistic X2 =5.298
c)
critical value if the significance level is .05 =5.991
d)
0.05 < p-value <0.10
e)
No ; as p value is nt less than 0.05 level
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.