Suppose a mutual fund qualifies as having moderate risk if the standard deviation of its monthly rate of return is less than 5%. A mutual-fund rating agency randomly selects 21 months and determines the rate of return for a certain fund. The standard deviation of the rate of return is computed to be 3.42%. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the fund has moderate risk at the alpha equals 0.01 level of significance? A normal probability plot indicates that the monthly rates of return are normally distributed.
Claim: The standard deviation of the monthly rate of return is less than 5.
Sample size = n = 21
Sample standard deviation = s = 3.42
The null and alternative hypothesis is
Test statistic is
Degrees of freedom = n - 1 = 21 - 1= 20
Level of significance = 0.01
Critical value = 37.566
( From chi-square table)
Test statistic < critical value we fail to reject null hypothesis.
Conclusion: The fund has not moderate risk.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.