Janlandhe conducted a study on the effect of an oral antiplaque
rinse on plaque built up on teeth. Fourteen people whose teeth were
thoroughly cleaned and polished were randomly assigned to two
groups of seven subjects each. Both groups were assigned to use
oral rinses (no brushing) for a two-week period. Group 1 used a
rinse that contained an antiplaque agent. Group 2, the control
group, received a similar rinse except that, unknown to the
subjects; the rinse contained no antiplaque agent. A plaque index
x, a measure of plaque buildup, was recorded at 4, 7and 14 days.
The mean and standard deviation for the 14 days plaque measurements
are shown in the table for the two groups.
Control group | Antiplaque group | |
Sample size | 7 | 7 |
Mean | 1.26 | 0.78 |
Standard deviation | 0.32 | 0.32 |
State the alternate hypothesis that should be used to test the effectiveness of the antiplaque oral rinse.
a. |
m 1- m 2 = 0 |
|
b. |
m 1- m 2 does not = 0 |
|
c. |
m 1- m 2 > 0 |
|
d. |
m 1- m 2 < 0 |
Researcher want to test the effectiveness of the antiplaque oral rinse, i.e. researcher want to test whether there is any difference between the means for control group and antiplaque group
So, it is a two tailed hypothesis
Null hypothesis:- there is no difference between the means or m1 - m2 = 0
Alternate hypothesis:- there is a significant difference between the means or m1- m2 not equal to 0
Therefore, option B is correct alternate hypothesis for the given hypothesis test.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.