The times of first sprinkler activation for a series of tests with fire prevention sprinkler systems using an aqueous film-forming were (in sec): 25, 31, 21, 24, 21, 23, 16, 29, 17, 27, 15, 23, 19. The system has been designed so that true average activation time is at most 20 sec under such conditions. Does the data strongly contradict the validity of this design specification? Test the relevant hypotheses at significance level .05 using the P-value approach.
A. Moderate statistical significance
B. Strong statistical significance
C. No statistical significance
D. Very strong statistical significance
Values ( X ) | ||
25 | 6.8403 | |
31 | 74.2251 | |
21 | 1.9171 | |
24 | 2.6095 | |
21 | 1.9171 | |
23 | 0.3787 | |
16 | 40.7631 | |
29 | 43.7635 | |
17 | 28.9939 | |
27 | 21.3019 | |
15 | 54.5323 | |
23 | 0.3787 | |
19 | 11.4555 | |
Total | 291 | 289.0767 |
Mean
Standard deviation
To Test :-
H0 :-
H1 :-
Test Statistic :-
t = 1.7518
Test Criteria :-
Reject null hypothesis if
Result :- Fail to reject null hypothesis
Decision based on P value
P - value = P ( t > 1.7518 ) = 0.9474
Reject null hypothesis if P value <
level of significance
P - value = 0.9474 > 0.05 ,hence we fail to reject null
hypothesis
Conclusion :- Fail to reject null hypothesis
There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that true average activation time is at most 20 sec at 5% level of significance.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.