Lightbulbs of a certain type are advertised as having an average lifetime of 750 hours. The price of these bulbs is very favorable, so a potential customer has decided to go ahead with a purchase arrangement unless it can be conclusively demonstrated that the true average lifetime is smaller than what is advertised. A random sample of 40 bulbs was selected, the lifetime of each bulb determined, and the appropriate hypotheses were tested using MINITAB, resulting in the accompanying output.
Variable | N | Mean | StDev | SEMean | Z | P-Value |
lifetime | 40 | 738.44 | 38.13 | 6.03 |
−1.92 |
0.028 |
What conclusion would be appropriate for a significance level of 0.05?
Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.
What conclusion would be appropriate for a significance level of
0.01?
Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.
What significance level and conclusion would you recommend and
why?
To test against
Now,
The value of the test statistic = zobs = -1.92
and P-value = 0.028
At 5% level of significance,
Since P-value < 0.05, so we reject H0 at 5% level of significance.
Conclusion : Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.
At 1% level of significance,
Since P-value > 0.01, so we fail to reject H0 at 1% level of significance.
Conclusion : Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifetime of a bulb is less than 750 hours.
One should recommend 5% significance level since size = 5% is good enough as it controls type II errors well while having a decent value of type I error/size.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.