Question

Swain v. Alabama (1965) a lawsuit that argued that there was discrimination against African-Americans in grand...

  1. Swain v. Alabama (1965) a lawsuit that argued that there was discrimination against African-Americans in grand jury selection. This case used a statistical argument based on the data that 181 African-Americans out of a random sample of 1075 were called to appear for possible duty.   Using the information that Census data show that 24% of those eligible for jury service were African-America conduct the hypothesis test to test the claim of discrimination. Use a significance level of 0.025.
  1. State the null and alternative hypothesis
  2. Compute the test statistic and the p-value.
  3. Write your conclusion as if you are the expert witness in this case and explain what this p-value means to a jury.
  4. What assumptions do we need in order for the conditions of the hypothesis test procedure to be met?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a)
Below are the null and alternative Hypothesis,
Null Hypothesis: p = 0.24
Alternative Hypothesis: p < 0.24

b)
Test statistic,
z = (pcap - p)/sqrt(p*(1-p)/n)
z = (0.1684 - 0.24)/sqrt(0.24*(1-0.24)/1075)
z = -5.5

P-value Approach
P-value = 0.0000

c)
As P-value < 0.025, reject the null hypothesis.
P-value indicates the probabiliity of occurrence of pcap<0.1684 if p = 0.24
As this probability is very small, we reject the null hypothesis

d)
Data is normally distributed and
np >= 5 and n(1-p) >=5

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
2. Swain v. Alabama (1965) a lawsuit that argued that there was discrimination against African-Americans in...
2. Swain v. Alabama (1965) a lawsuit that argued that there was discrimination against African-Americans in grand jury selection. This case used a statistical argument based on the data that 181 African-Americans out of a random sample of 1075 were called to appear for possible duty. Using the information that Census data show that 24% of those eligible for jury service were African-America conduct the hypothesis test to test the claim of discrimination. Use a significance level of 0.025. a)...
It is alleged that there is discrimination against blacks in grand jury selection. Some survey suggested...
It is alleged that there is discrimination against blacks in grand jury selection. Some survey suggested that 24% of those eligible for grand jury service were black. However inspecting a random sample of 1100 called to appear for possible jury duty, we found only 229 were blacks. Suppose we want to test the survey's claim against the alternative that the actual proportion of blacks called for jury duty is less than what the survey suggests. 1.Rejection region: We reject H0...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...