10 states comparable in size, wealth, and purchasing powers were selected to investigate the effect of marketing expenditures on sales of televisions. For each state, the marketing expenditure X-thousands of dollars and the sales Y-units sold are shown below:
Marketing expenditure | sales |
4.9 | 27 |
8.8 | 42 |
2.1 | 16 |
7.6 | 35 |
4.4 | 33 |
3.5 | 28 |
7.0 | 40 |
10.1 | 43 |
5.6 | 35 |
3.0 | 21 |
Determine the regression equation for predicting sales from expenditure. Construct the 99 percent confidence interval for the slope of the regression line.
If the prediction equation derived was to be applied to the population as a whole, what proportion of the variability in sales figures could be predicted from knowledge of marketing expenditure.
SUMMARY OUTPUT | |||||
Regression Statistics | |||||
Multiple R | 0.919158799 | ||||
R Square | 0.844852898 | ||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.825459511 | ||||
Standard Error | 3.741928104 | ||||
Observations | 10 | ||||
ANOVA | |||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | |
Regression | 1 | 609.9837925 | 609.9837925 | 43.56396678 | 0.000169334 |
Residual | 8 | 112.0162075 | 14.00202593 | ||
Total | 9 | 722 | |||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | |
Intercept | 14.07779579 | 2.961991321 | 4.752814664 | 0.001440031 | 7.247431551 |
Marketing expenditure | 3.144246353 | 0.476379272 | 6.600300507 | 0.000169334 | 2.045713781 |
Sales^= 14.0778 + 3.144 * Marketing expenditure
99% confidence interval for slope
1.545809 | 4.742683 |
r^2 = 0.8449
hence 84.49 % of variation in sales figures is explained by this model
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.