[Hint: The t-statistics in the Coefficients table assume all other predictors are included in the model, so if we square these we get the F-statistics in the ANOVA table based on Adjusted Sums of Squares.]
Source |
df |
Seq SS |
Adj SS |
F-statistic based on Adj SS |
p-value based on Adj SS |
Regression |
3 |
8208.9 |
39.38 |
0.000 |
|
X1 |
1 |
5453.4 |
1772.2 |
25.50 |
0.000 |
X2 |
1 |
2551.7 |
|||
X3 |
1 |
2.93 |
0.090 |
||
Error |
93 |
---- |
------- |
||
Total |
96 |
14671.5 |
14671.5 |
---- |
------- |
Coefficients
Term |
Coef |
SE coef |
t-statistic |
p-value |
Constant |
-15.71 |
4.60 |
-3.42 |
0.001 |
X1 |
2.638 |
0.522 |
5.05 |
0.000 |
X2 |
0.5108 |
0.0842 |
||
X3 |
0.0106 |
0.00620 |
1.71 |
0.090 |
Given that
a) It is already solved in the question
b) The sequential sum of squares tells us how much the SSE declines after we add another variable to the model that contains only the variables preceding it. By contrast, the adjusted sum of squares tells us how much the SSE declines after we add another variable to the model that contains every other variable.
So if you start with zero predictors and add X1, SS Regression increases by 5434.4. Then if you also add X3, the SS Regression increases by an additional 203.8. These are the sequential SS, which add up to the total SS Regression of 8208.9 if you add X2 too.
Thus we can say SSR(X3|X1) = 203.8
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.