Question 1
The association between cellular telephone use and the risk of brain cancer was investigated in a case-control study. The study included 475 cases and 400 controls and the following results were seen:
Cases |
Controls |
||
Cellular Phone User |
Yes |
270 |
200 |
No |
205 |
200 |
|
Total |
475 |
400 |
Calculate the odds ratio based on these data.
The p value for this odds ratio is 0.06. State your interpretation of this p-value.
Gender was considered a potential confounder and effect measure modifier in this study. The data were stratified into males and females in order to assess these issues.
Males |
Females |
||||||
Cases |
Controls |
Cases |
Controls |
||||
Cellular Phone User |
Yes |
242 |
150 |
Yes |
28 |
50 |
|
No |
100 |
50 |
No |
105 |
150 |
||
OR (Cases)=Number of favourable outcome/Number of unfavourable outcome = = 270/205=1.32:1
and Odds (Control)=200/200=1:1
OR=Odds of intervention group/Odds of Control group=1.32/1=1.32:1
OR(Males cases)=242/100=2.42:1 and OR ( Males control)=150/50=3:1
OR=2.42/3=0.81:1
OR(Females cases)=28/105=0.27:1 OR (Female control)=0.33:1
OR=0.27/0.33=0.82:1
Therefore, gender is a confounder in the study. Because, in second case (stratum based odds ratios) the intervention is found to be better than control, compared to first case, where control was found to be better than intervention.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.