Question

The Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter asks you to use a sign test...

The Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter asks you to use a sign test with a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the overall temperature distribution of Madison, Wisconsin, is different (either way) from that of Juneau, Alaska. The monthly average data (in °F) are as follows.

Month Jan. Feb. March April May June
Madison 17.4 21.9 31.4 46.7 57.9 67.5
Juneau 22.3 27.8 31.7 38.5 46.7 52.6
Month July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Madison 71.5 69.5 60.9 51.4 35.1 22.9
Juneau 55.9 54.5 49.4 41.4 32.1 26.7

(a) What is the level of significance?

State the null and alternate hypotheses.

Ho: Distributions are different. H1: Distributions are different.

Ho: Distributions are different. H1: Distributions are the same.   

Ho: Distributions are the same. H1: Distributions are different.

Ho: Distributions are the same. H1: Distributions are the same.



(b) Compute the sample test statistic. (Use 2 decimal places.)

What sampling distribution will you use?

Student's t

chi-square    

uniform

normal



(c) Find the P-value of the sample test statistic. (Use 4 decimal places.)

(d) Conclude the test?

At the ? = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

At the ? = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.    

At the ? = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

At the ? = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.


(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the temperature distribution differs in Juneau and Madison.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the temperature distribution differs in Juneau and Madison.  

  Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the temperature distribution differs in Juneau and Madison.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the temperature distribution differs in Juneau and Madison.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(a) level of significance=0.05

Ho: Distributions are the same. H1: Distributions are different.

(b) test statistic:


What sampling distribution will you use?

Student's t

(c) Find the P-value of the sample test statistic. (Use 4 decimal places.)

p-value=2P(t> 2.63|t11)= 0.0234


(d) Conclude the test?

Since p-value<0.05, so

at the = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.   

(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the temperature distribution differs in Juneau and Madison.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Asian economies impact some of the world's largest populations. The growth of an economy has a...
Asian economies impact some of the world's largest populations. The growth of an economy has a big influence on the everyday lives of ordinary people. Are Asian economies changing? A random sample of 15 Asian economies gave the following information about annual percentage growth rate. (Reference: Handbook of International Economic Statistics, U.S. Government Documents.) Region 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Modern Growth Rate % 4.2 2.7 7.4 2.6 0.8 5.3 2.6 4.8 Historic Growth Rate 3.1 1.3...
Asian economies impact some of the world's largest populations. The growth of an economy has a...
Asian economies impact some of the world's largest populations. The growth of an economy has a big influence on the everyday lives of ordinary people. Are Asian economies changing? A random sample of 15 Asian economies gave the following information about annual percentage growth rate. (Reference: Handbook of International Economic Statistics, U.S. Government Documents.) Region 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Modern Growth Rate % 4.5 2.4 7.4 2.6 0.4 5.4 2.1 4.6 Historic Growth Rate 3.6 1.5...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 7.03 6.54 6.12 6.75 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.294. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 5.91 5.77 7.45 7.66...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.75 6.26 6.96 5.77 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.334. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 8.15 5.91 6.19 7.10...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.61 6.40 5.84 6.82 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.304. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 7.87 5.70 7.24 5.98...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.96 7.10 5.84 5.91 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.384. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 5.91 5.91 5.91 5.91...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.54 7.17 5.91 7.10 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.357. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 6.12 6.89 6.61 8.15...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 5.98 6.12 6.05 6.96 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.326. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 7.94 8.15 7.03 6.47...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.47   5.70   6.75   6.47   7.31   7.18 7.06   5.79   6.24   5.91   6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.316. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 8.08   6.96   6.89   6.05  ...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.61 7.03 5.98 6.96 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.321. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 6.47 7.03 7.24 8.15...