Question

How generalizable do you think your results are from correlation test when r(10)=.557,p=.060

How generalizable do you think your results are from correlation test when r(10)=.557,p=.060

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Suppose the significance level is

The p value is 0.060

Since p value is greater than significance level.

We can conclude that that there is no linear relationship between the variables X and Y.

But if Significance Level

The p value is 0.060

In this case, p value is less than significance level, we can conclude that there exist a linear relationship beween X and Y.

And the value of r shows that there is moderate positive linear correlation between X and Y.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Do a Hypothesis Test for the Correlation Coefficient ,r, that you calculated in the previous HW...
Do a Hypothesis Test for the Correlation Coefficient ,r, that you calculated in the previous HW problem, Correlation(Part 1) . Assume that you want to test for a positive correlation. Let α,your level of significance ,be .05.The number of observations, n, is 5.Use n-2 degrees of freedom. Do you reject or do not reject H0 ? You need to do the 6 steps for the Neymann-Pearson critical value test.You do not need to do a Fisher p-value test for the...
The test results of a correlation analysis conducted to assess the relationship between body mass index...
The test results of a correlation analysis conducted to assess the relationship between body mass index and body fat percentage indicated a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) value of 0.71. Interpret the r value in terms of strength and direction. The significance (p= 0.14) was tested at α = 0.01. Was there a statistically significant correlation between body mass index and body fat percentage? How did you arrive at your conclusion?
(a) Suppose n = 6 and the sample correlation coefficient is r = 0.894. Is r...
(a) Suppose n = 6 and the sample correlation coefficient is r = 0.894. Is r significant at the 1% level of significance (based on a two-tailed test)? (Round your answers to three decimal places.) t = critical t = Conclusion: Yes, the correlation coefficient ρ is significantly different from 0 at the 0.01 level of significance. No, the correlation coefficient ρ is not significantly different from 0 at the 0.01 level of significance.     (b) Suppose n = 10 and...
Test for evidence of a linear association using the sample correlation r=0.68 and the sample size...
Test for evidence of a linear association using the sample correlation r=0.68 and the sample size n=10. State the null and alternative hypotheses.       Find the test statistic. Round your answer to two decimal places. t= Enter your answer; t Find the p-value. Round your answer to three decimal places. The p-value is Enter your answer; p-value . What is the conclusion, using a 5% significance level? Choose the answer from the menu; What is the conclusion, using a...
Defining racism: The R = P + P formulation How would you define racism? Do you...
Defining racism: The R = P + P formulation How would you define racism? Do you think power and oppression should be a part of our definition of racism, and why do you feel that way?
What do you think about R&D being deducted from revenue? (hint: think about accounting, how do...
What do you think about R&D being deducted from revenue? (hint: think about accounting, how do accountants try to match expenses with revenue? Does the deduction of R&D adhere to the general rule of matching expenses and revenue)?
Test for a negative correlation using the sample correlation r=-0.39 and the sample size n=18. State...
Test for a negative correlation using the sample correlation r=-0.39 and the sample size n=18. State the null and alternative hypotheses.       Find the test statistic. Round your answer to two decimal places. t= Find the p-value. Round your answer to three decimal places. The p-value is  . What is the conclusion, using a 5% significance level?                                                                      ...
Based on your understanding of correlation, do you think using regression is really necessary? Why or...
Based on your understanding of correlation, do you think using regression is really necessary? Why or why not?
From the data on 10 students it was found that the sample linear correlation coefficient (r)...
From the data on 10 students it was found that the sample linear correlation coefficient (r) between their Math scores and English scores was 0.75. a) Overall if the Math Score increases, does the English score increase or decrease? b)(b) At a=0.10, what is the critical value of the correlation coefficient (r a/2 (c) From the result of part (b), do you conclude that there is a significant linear correlation between Math and English scores in general? (Answer YES or...
You are optimistic and believe that more than 10% think - this gives you your hypothesis...
You are optimistic and believe that more than 10% think - this gives you your hypothesis H0: p>0,1 for a proportion test. So you test 100 people. You observe that only 8% (8 of your sample of 100) people seem to be able to think. Is your hypothesis still acceptable or do you have to reject it? Use the test statistics which is standard normal distributed. 1-α=0.05