The project manager of a company developed an improvement
alternative where the results showed a productivity increase. The
plant manager is not confident with this information and wants to
validate the improvement with a 97.5% of confidence level. The
expected mean is 20lbs/hr and has a variance of 4lbs/hr. The plant
manager requested 10 samples: 20.3, 23, 22, 23.5, 21.9, 24, 23, 22,
22.5, 24. Develop the five steps of the hypothesis analysis and
determine if the project manager improved the rate from
20lb/hr.
Choose one of the following alternatives:
Ho: μ = 20lb/hr, H1: μ < 20lb/hr |
||
Ho: μ = 20lb/hr, H1: μ > 20lb/hr |
||
Ho: μ = 20lb/hr, H1: μ ≠ 20lb/hr |
||
Ho: μ < 20lb/hr, H1: μ > 20lb/hr |
Values ( X ) | ||
20.3 | 5.3824 | |
23 | 0.1444 | |
22 | 0.3844 | |
23.5 | 0.7744 | |
21.9 | 0.5184 | |
24 | 1.9044 | |
23 | 0.1444 | |
22 | 0.3844 | |
22.5 | 0.0144 | |
24 | 1.9044 | |
Total | 226.2 | 11.556 |
To Test :-
Ho: μ = 20lb/hr
H1: μ > 20lb/hr
Test Statistic :-
t = 7.3119
Test Criteria :-
Reject null hypothesis if
Result :- Reject null hypothesis
Conclusion :- Accept Alternative Hypothesis
μ > 20lb/hr
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the project manager improved the rate from 20lb/hr.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.