Question 94 pts
Dr. Nardole investigated the relationship between I.Q. and amount of time binge-watching sci-fi on Netflix. He finds a correlation coefficient of .91, which is significant at the .05 alpha level.
But Dr. Nardole is very smart and does not conclude that high IQ leads to binge-watching sci-fi. He writes that “the causal connection could actually be the opposite: Watching sci-fi may make one more intelligent. There is no way to know from the correlational data.”
What principle is demonstrated by Dr. Nardole's statement?
directionality |
third variable problem |
An unreasonable alpha level |
All of these are correct |
(A) Directionality is the correct answer because there are variables which are correlated to each other, but it is not clear that which one causes the change in other variable. Thus, it is a directionality principle which is demonstrated by Dr Nardole's statement.
(B) It is not a third variable problem because Dr Nardole's statement include only 2 variables and specifically mentioned that he don't know which one causing the change in the other variable. So, it is clear that there is no third variable involved in the statement.
(C) We can pick any alpha level to test the significance of correlation. So, it is an incorrect option
Only option A is correct.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.