Question

Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin...

Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The intent of this large-scale and comprehensive study was to characterize fully this population of landscapers as normally distributed with a corresponding population mean and standard deviation, which were determined from the data collection of the entire population.

Suppose you are now in a different reality in which this study never took place though you are still interested in studying the average vitamin D levels of US landscapers. In other words, the underlying population mean and standard deviation are now unknown to you. Furthermore, you would like to examine if wearing tank tops instead of short sleeve shirts significantly effects vitamin D levels. To accomplish this, you propose to collect data from the landscapers at two different points in time. Specifically, the landscapers are to wear short sleeve shirts while outside working during a period of three weeks. After three weeks, you collect blood specimens and the landscapers are then to wear tank tops for the next three weeks under the same working conditions, after which you collect blood draws a second time. You obtain research funding to randomly sample 44 landscapers, collect blood samples at two different time points as described above, and send these samples to your collaborating lab in order to quantify the amount of vitamin D in the landscapers' blood. After anxiously awaiting your colleagues to complete their lab quantification protocol, they email you the following vitamin D level data as shown in the following table.

Subject Time Point 1, Shirts
Vitamin D (ng/mL)
Time Point 2, Tank Tops
Vitamin D (ng/mL)
1 44.265 22.441
2 41.681 29.863
3 38.418 28.554
4 53.197 30.752
5 51.202 25.736
6 33.329 30.924
7 33.558 35.181
8 51.820 23.336
9 44.105 35.307
10 46.219 30.449
11 48.724 23.699
12 43.675 33.445
13 50.605 32.659
14 56.323 29.940
15 54.620 34.779
16 43.244 31.221
17 47.470 28.504
18 45.657 22.623
19 48.714 34.379
20 43.183 30.759
21 46.505 28.025
22 46.643 30.560
23 42.883 28.374
24 38.949 32.660
25 42.552 30.668
26 51.432 28.308
27 48.329 32.815
28 45.195 27.508
29 56.078 27.174
30 43.361 29.104
31 46.869 28.384
32 46.076 25.247
33 41.810 34.027
34 47.533 29.059
35 47.970 35.541
36 46.101 35.743
37 43.185 32.460
38 46.863 35.466
39 43.693 37.052
40 46.926 38.258
41 43.997 31.581
42 41.986 25.363
43 55.691 31.229
44 40.977 30.938

What is the estimated 95% confidence interval (CI) of the average difference in blood vitamin D levels between short sleeve shirt and tank top attire amongst US landscapers in ng/mL?

Please note the following: 1) in practice, you as the analyst decide how to calculate the difference in vitamin D levels between time points for a given study participant, and subsequently interpret the aggregated results appropriately in the context of the data, though for the purposes of this exercise the difference is assigned for you as follows. Define the difference as the second minus the first time points, which is common practice, since the plus or minus sign of the resulting difference reflects any change over sequential time; 2) you might calculate a CI that is different from any of the multiple choice options listed below due to rounding differences, therefore select the closest match; 3) ensure you use either the large or small sample CI formula as appropriate; and 4) you may copy and paste the data into Excel to facilitate analysis.

Select one:

a. -17.53 to -13.45 ng/mL

b. -18.75 to -11.84 ng/mL

c. -18.84 to -12.04 ng/mL

d. -19.80 to -14.66 ng/mL

Homework Answers

Answer #2

taking difference as 2nd -1st observations for each individual observation:

sample mean 'x̄= -15.489
sample size   n= 44.00
sample std deviation s= 6.895
std error 'sx=s/√n=6.895/sqrt(44)= 1.039
for 95 % CI value of z= 1.960
margin of error E=z*std error = 2.04
lower bound=sample mean-E= -17.53
Upper bound=sample mean+E= -13.45
from above 95% confidence interval for population mean =(-17.53,-13.45)

option A is correct

a. -17.53 to -13.45 ng/mL

answered by: anonymous
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin...
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The intent of this large-scale and comprehensive study was to characterize fully this population of landscapers as normally distributed with a corresponding population mean and standard deviation, which were determined from the data collection of the entire population. Suppose you are now in a different reality in which this study never took place though...
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin...
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The intent of this large-scale and comprehensive study was to characterize fully this population of landscapers as normally distributed with a corresponding population mean and standard deviation, which were determined from the data collection of the entire population. Suppose you are now in a different reality in which this study never took place though...
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin...
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The intent of this large-scale and comprehensive study was to characterize fully this population of landscapers as normally distributed with a corresponding population mean and standard deviation, which were determined from the data collection of the entire population. Suppose you are now in a different reality in which this study never took place though...
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin...
Recall in our discussion of the normal distribution the research study that examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The intent of this large-scale and comprehensive study was to characterize fully this population of landscapers as normally distributed with a corresponding population mean and standard deviation, which were determined from the data collection of the entire population. Suppose you are now in a different reality in which this study never took place though...
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape...
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The population average level of vitamin D in US landscapers was found to be 41.37 ng/mL with a standard deviation of 4.43 ng/mL. Assuming the true distribution of blood vitamin D levels follows a Gaussian distribution, if you randomly select a landscaper in the US, what is the likelihood that his/her vitamin D level will be 31.47 ng/mL or more? Answer:
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape...
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The population average level of vitamin D in US landscapers was found to be 47.84 ng/mL with a standard deviation of 4.465 ng/mL. Assuming the true distribution of blood vitamin D levels follows a normal distribution, if you randomly select a landscaper in the US, what is the likelihood that his/her vitamin D level will be 50.08 ng/mL or more?
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape...
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The population average level of vitamin D in US landscapers was found to be 40.42 ng/mL with a standard deviation of 5.446 ng/mL. Assuming the true distribution of blood vitamin D levels follows a Gaussian distribution, if you randomly select a landscaper in the US, what is the likelihood that his/her vitamin D level will be between 49.82 and 58.82 ng/mL?
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape...
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The population average level of vitamin D in US landscapers was found to be 49.23 ng/mL with a standard deviation of 5.534 ng/mL. Assuming the true distribution of blood vitamin D levels follows a gaussian distribution, if you randomly select a landscaper in the US, what is the probability that his/her vitamin D level will be 62.39 ng/mL or less?
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape...
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The population average level of vitamin D in US landscapers was found to be 41.73 ng/mL with a standard deviation of 5.334 ng/mL. Assuming the true distribution of blood vitamin D levels follows a normal distribution, if you randomly select a landscaper in the US, what is the probability that his/her vitamin D level will be 34.93 ng/mL or more?
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape...
A research study examined the blood vitamin D levels of the entire US population of landscape gardeners. The population average level of vitamin D in US landscapers was found to be 42.93 ng/mL with a standard deviation of 4.251 ng/mL. Assuming the true distribution of blood vitamin D levels follows a Gaussian distribution, if you randomly select a landscaper in the US, what is the probability that his/her vitamin D level will be between 32.13 and 43.89 ng/mL?
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT