Interpret the post hoc analysis. The tables show two different versions of the post hoc analysis. Make sure you include all three variables, i.e. Variable X is significantly different from Variable Y but not Z.
Weight lost (kg)
(I) Diet |
(J) Diet |
Mean Difference (I-J) |
Std. Error |
Sig. |
|
Low calorie |
Low fat |
.2741 |
.67188 |
.912 |
|
Low carbohydrate |
-1.8481* |
.67188 |
.020 |
||
Low fat |
Low calorie |
-.2741 |
.67188 |
.912 |
|
Low carbohydrate |
-2.1222* |
.65182 |
.005 |
||
Low carbohydrate |
Low calorie |
1.8481* |
.67188 |
.020 |
|
Low fat |
2.1222* |
.65182 |
.005 |
Weight lost (kg) |
|||
Tukey HSDa,b,c |
|||
Diet |
N |
Subset |
|
1 |
2 |
||
Low fat |
27 |
3.0259 |
|
Low calorie |
24 |
3.3000 |
|
Low carbohydrate |
27 |
5.1481 |
Interpret the post hoc analysis. The tables show two different versions of the post hoc analysis. Make sure you include all three variables, i.e. Variable X is significantly different from Variable Y but not Z.
Note: not three variables, there are 3 groups compared.
Low calorie not significantly different from Low fat ( P=0.912)
Low calorie significantly different from Low carbohydrate ( P=0.020)
Low fat significantly different from Low carbohydrate ( P=0.005)
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.