An auditor reviewed 20 oral surgery insurance claims from a particular surgical office, determining that the mean out-of-pocket patient billing above the reimbursed amount was $270.35 with a standard deviation of $75.34.
At the 5 percent level of significance, does this sample prove a violation of the guideline that the average patient should pay no more than $250 out-of-pocket? |
(a-1) |
H0: ? ? $250 versus H1: ? > $250. Choose the right option. |
a. | Reject H0 if tcalc < 1.729 |
b. | Reject H0 if tcalc > 1.729 |
(a-2) |
Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) |
Test statistic |
(a-3) | The null hypothesis should be rejected. | ||||
|
(a-4) | The evidence does not show that the average out-of-pocket expense is greater than $250. | ||||
|
(b) | Is this a close decision? | ||||
|
a-1)
H0: <= 250
Ha: > 250
This is right tailed test.
t critical value at 0.05 significance level for 19 df = 1.729
Decision rule = Reject H0 if t > 1.729
a-2)
Test statistics
t = - / S / sqrt(n)
= 270.35 - 250 / 75.34 / sqrt(20)
= 1.21
This is test statistics value
a-3)
Since t < 1.729, we do not have sufficient evidence to reject H0.
So, the statement null hypothesis should be rejected is False.
a-4)
The Statement, evidence does not show that the average out-of-pocket expence is greater
than $250 is TRUE
b)
Since t test statistics value is much less than critical value(1.729), this is not close decision.
No.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.