Question

Reading Response #15 – “Think about an argument you’ve had recently in which people disagreed about the facts of the issue. How did you resolve the factual dispute? Did the arguers ever agree on what the facts were? If not, how was the argument resolved?” (Katz 429).

Answer 1

A recent argument over the social networking conundrum, wherein there was a polarizing disagreement on the statistical numbers of people that are hooked on to it due to the dopamine pathway being activated and thus activating the reinforce behavior.

The factual response can always, in my opinion, be resolved by breaking the following conundrum down in corollary arguments and corollary Justification that lead to the final consequence.

The arguers did finally agree on the actuality of facts, a thing broken down according to the gestalt principle can always be comprehended and agreed upon.