Question

In your own words, create three simple arguments. Each argument should instantiate one of the valid...

In your own words, create three simple arguments. Each argument should instantiate one of the valid or invalid argument.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Valid argument means when all the premises or statements are true , argument or conclusion must be true .

While invalid argument refer to condition when all premises are true but argument or conclusion is false .

1)

Premise 1 All athletes are fit.

Premise 2 Merry is an Athlete .

Conclusion Merry is Fit .

It is a valid argument .

2)

Premise 1 One who is good at maths is good at science .

Premise 2 David is good at Science .

Conclusion David is good at maths .

This is an invalid arguement because those who are good at maths are good in science but it is not necessary , as per premise , that all who are good in science must be good in maths. There is possibility that David ia good in science but not in maths .

3)

Premise 1 All birds produce egg

Premise 2 Parrot is a bird.

Conclusion Parrot produces egg.

It is a valid arguement because if both premise are true , conclusion is always true .

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Explain, in your own words, what psychological egoism is.  Create your own unique example to clarify...
Explain, in your own words, what psychological egoism is.  Create your own unique example to clarify your explanation. Select one of the three arguments for psychological egoism; after objectively presenting the argument of your choice, critically evaluate its persuasiveness. ETHICS
1. Provide, in your own words, two arguments in favor of the human capital model. 2....
1. Provide, in your own words, two arguments in favor of the human capital model. 2. Provide, in your own words, two arguments in favor of the signaling model. 3. Which argument did you find to be the strongest? Discuss the evidence that you feel is most convincing. Why?
For each of the arguments below, do the following: A) Identify whether the argument is valid...
For each of the arguments below, do the following: A) Identify whether the argument is valid or invalid, B) If the argument is in one of the forms we discussed (e.g. modus ponens, modus tollens, denying the antecedent, etc - then identify the form, C) If the argument commits a fallacy we discussed, identify the fallacy. 1) All cats are reptiles. Garfield is a cat. Therefore, Garfield is a reptile. 2) If one studies hard, then one will pass the...
Can an argument with a false conclusion be valid? Explain your answer and give your own...
Can an argument with a false conclusion be valid? Explain your answer and give your own example to illustrate your explanation.
Indicate whether the argument form is valid (V), or invalid (I). Show your work. ~p ∨...
Indicate whether the argument form is valid (V), or invalid (I). Show your work. ~p ∨ (~q ∨ r) ~p ⊃ r ∴ q ∨ r Indicate whether the argument form is valid (V) or invalid (I). Show your work. ~p ≡ q p ⊃ q ∴ ~p ● q
Use the modern square of opposition to write both a valid and an invalid argument, each...
Use the modern square of opposition to write both a valid and an invalid argument, each with a single premise in standard form( A,E, I or O) followed directly by a conclusion in standard form (A,E,I, or O)
Try to only use clear cases.  True premises should clearly be true, false premises should clearly be...
Try to only use clear cases.  True premises should clearly be true, false premises should clearly be false, strong support in an inductive argument should clearly be strong, and weak support in an inductive argument should clearly be weak. Here are the requested arguments: A valid deductive argument with all true premises. A valid deductive argument with at least one false premise.   An invalid deductive argument with all true premises. An invalid deductive argument with at least one false premise. An...
Identify what you think should be candidate keys, and write in your own words the constraints...
Identify what you think should be candidate keys, and write in your own words the constraints under which each candidate key would be valid.
Provide your own original argument and identify its logical structure. Be sure to clearly identify the...
Provide your own original argument and identify its logical structure. Be sure to clearly identify the premises and conclusion. Is it deductive or inductive? Is it valid? What criticism can be made of your argument? Minimum of 200 words
Clearly and briefly articulate and explain in your own words 1 argument used against an active...
Clearly and briefly articulate and explain in your own words 1 argument used against an active stabilization policy.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT