is it appropriate lying to the public while working in the public administration filed(local, state, and federal government or nonprofit sector), and if so, what ethical standards would be violated from a public administrative perspective?
Note: This response is in UK English, please paste the response to MS Word and you should be able to spot discrepancies easily. You may elaborate the answer based on personal views or your classwork if necessary.
(Answer)Firstly, it is essential to be able to distinguish between lying and withholding confidential information. When a person of authority withholds confidential or sensitive information from the public, it is something that would generally be disclosed upon the accomplishment of the mission. Secondly, if confidential information is not disclosed, it might entail covert operations that enemy states or other institutions should not know about. Such information is only shared with the concerned departments and typically isn’t within areas of public interest. For instance, investigation details about a terrorist or pursuit within a covert mission are examples of such operations.
On the other hand, lying would involve details that are within public interest and never disclosed at any stage of the operation. Such an act would be illegal as any person within a government office is under oath to not hide or misconstrued the truth from the public. Hiding the truth would be against the ethical codes of the oath that is taken. Secondly, people within public offices are “public servants” in other words, someone like the president is actually employed by the people of a democracy. In this case, the people are the boss of anyone who works in a government office. It would be unethical to lie to the people for whom the office is run in the first place.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.