Question

Dr. Shue is a faculty member in a doctoral psychology program. She is sitting in the...

Dr. Shue is a faculty member in a doctoral psychology program. She is sitting in the faculty-student lounge and overhears two graduate students making derogatory, heterosexist comments about another student in the program. Support your discussion with relevant General Principles and Ethical Standards.

Does she have a professional obligation to intervene in the students’ “private” discussion?

Are there ethical reasons she should not intervene?

Should she discuss her observations with another faculty?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Dr. Shue does not have a professional obligation to intervene in the students' "private" discussion. However, it is stated that discussion is overheard in the faculty- student lounge area (public, not a personal space) so as a faculty member she has personal responsibility (according to Principle 1: Ethical conduct towards students) to deal justly and considerately with each student and seek to resolve problems including discipline; to make constructive effort to protect students from conditions detrimental to learning, health and safety.

Under this she has responsibility to engage constructivily with students in their conversation, perspective (unhealthy or derogatory for another student) and educate them over how they can better accept the diversity, be respectful to fellow student and other such members of society in endevour to make students better citizens too.

With this she also pledged (according to Principle 4: Ethical conduct towards parents and community) to understand values and traditions of diverse cultures represented in the community and in his/her own classroom- in this light she has responsibilty to make students understand too in good knowledge, acceptance and empathy different values of different people.

She should not discuss her observations with another faculty as it was just one conversation she happened to overhear. It was not a complaint or any talk made accessible to other faculty by consent. She has personal responsibility (according to Principle 1: Ethical conduct towards students) to not intentionally expose the student to disparagement.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Is the following scenarios Ethical or Unethical? If it is ethical select true. If if is...
Is the following scenarios Ethical or Unethical? If it is ethical select true. If if is unethical select false 1) “A recently hired school psychologist discovered that district-mandated test batteries for suspected learning disabilities were outdated, were inconsistent with current professional standards, and violated the intent of special education laws that require that tests be selected in light of the unique characteristics of the individual child. She reasoned that as a new hire, it would be professionally risky to raise...
Analyze the case using the 8-Step Model for Ethical Analysis; Gather the facts, Define the ethical...
Analyze the case using the 8-Step Model for Ethical Analysis; Gather the facts, Define the ethical issues, Identify the affected parties, Identify the consequences, Identify the obligations, Consider your character and integrity, Think creatively about potential actions, Check your gut. Case Information Josh O’Shaun, newly appointed CEO of Morris County Hospital (MCH), faced many problems in his 200-bed facility. One of the most pressing, in terms of patient service, was a nurse retention rate that continually caused understaffing. His root-cause...
Assignment: What are the main arguments in the article? Please answer within 5 hours. It is...
Assignment: What are the main arguments in the article? Please answer within 5 hours. It is extremely urgent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BIOETHICS. Bioethics as a field is relatively new, emerging only in the late 1960s, though many of the questions it addresses are as old as medicine itself. When Hippocrates wrote his now famous dictum Primum non nocere (First, do no harm), he was grappling with one of the core issues still facing human medicine, namely, the role and duty of the...
What topics are covered in the following article? Please answer within 5 hours. It is extremely...
What topics are covered in the following article? Please answer within 5 hours. It is extremely urgent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BIOETHICS. Bioethics as a field is relatively new, emerging only in the late 1960s, though many of the questions it addresses are as old as medicine itself. When Hippocrates wrote his now famous dictum Primum non nocere (First, do no harm), he was grappling with one of the core issues still facing human medicine, namely, the role and duty of the physician....
Gender Bias in the Executive Suite Worldwide The Grant Thornton International Business Report (IBR) has described...
Gender Bias in the Executive Suite Worldwide The Grant Thornton International Business Report (IBR) has described itself as "a quarterly survey of business leaders from across the globe … surveying 11,500 businesses in 40 economies across the globe on an annual basis." 1 According to the 2011 IBR, the Asia Pacific region had a higher percentage (27 percent) of female chief executive officers (CEOs) than Europe and North America. Japan is the only Asia Pacific region exception. The report further...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT